|
<br />166
<br />reguJ.ar meeting, january 24, 1977
<br />
<br />page two
<br />
<br />23, 1966 (VOL. 32) BY CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOTS 24 AND 25 OF THE
<br />MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON LH. 35 SOUTH, FROM "c"
<br />(COMMERCIAL) TO "C-2" (COMMERCIAL).
<br />
<br />Mr. Arredondo moved the Ordinance be approved on first reading. Mr. James
<br />seconded the motion. On roll call, the following vote was recorded:
<br />
<br />A.YE:
<br />NAY:
<br />ABSTAIN:
<br />
<br />Craddock, Hansen, James, Sutton, Arredondo, Breihan
<br />None
<br />Cavazos.
<br />
<br />The ~~yor opened a Public Hearing to consider a request for a change in the I
<br />zoning of part of Lot 8, Block 22 of the Original Town of San Marcos, located
<br />at 301 E. Hutchison, from "c" to "C-2". Present to request the change were
<br />Mr. & Mrs. George Childress, applicants. Mr. Childress stated that a portion
<br />of the present structure would be removed so that adequate parking could be
<br />provided. Mr. L.O. Backus, an owner of property within 200 feet of the property
<br />in question stated that he was opposed to the rezoning mainly because he felt
<br />the 12 spaces required by ordinance were insufficient. Jo Ann Childress, also
<br />anpoYpertgf property within 200 feet, objected because of insufficient parking
<br />and increased traffic the business would bring. Ruben Meeks, representing the
<br />owners of Nelson Center objected on the basis of insufficient parking and also
<br />pointed out the property was within Fire Zone #1. Mr. Meeks said the City had
<br />earlier required the demolition of wooden structures occupying what is now
<br />Nelson Center and that the structure in question should have been condemned at
<br />the same time. Amos Murray, a property owner within 200 feet objected on the
<br />basis of insufficient parking and also stated his opposition to alcoholic beverages
<br />on premises. Elmer Satterwhite objected on the basis of insufficient parking.
<br />Don Wilsford supported the change in zoning, stating that the building was not
<br />now an aaset to the City, that it would be when renovated, and that additional
<br />parking would be provided. Councilman Breihan stated that he was going to vote
<br />against the ordinance because he could not approve a "C-2" zoning change under
<br />the pr'~sent zoning ordinance. Fburgp~tit~onseof objection were presented. They
<br />are attached and made a part of these minutes. The Mayor closed the hearing and
<br />read an ordinance having the following caption:
<br />
<br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, I
<br />AHENDING SECTION 3 OF THAT ORDINANCE WHICH REGULATES AND RESTRICTS
<br />. THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND LAND, DATED MAY
<br />23, 1966 (VOL. 32) BY CHANGING THE ZONING OF PART OF LOT 8, BLOCK 22
<br />OF' THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF SAN MARCOS, LOCATED AT 301 E. HUTCHISON, FROM
<br />"c" (COMMERCIAL) TO "C-2" (COMMERCIAL).
<br />
<br />Mr. Breihan moved the Ordinance not be approved. Mr. Sutton seconded the motion.
<br />On roll call, the following vote was recorded:
<br />
<br />AYE: Sutton, Breihan, Craddock
<br />NAY: Hansen, James, Arredondo, Cavazos.
<br />
<br />The Mayor declared the motion failed. Mr. Hansen moved the Ordinance be approved
<br />(on first reading. Mr. Cavazos seconded the motion. On roll call, the following vote
<br />was recorded:
<br />
<br />AYE: James, Arredondo, Cavazos, Hansen
<br />NAY: Sutton, Breihan, Craddock.
<br />
<br />The Mayor read the caption of an Ordinance as follows:
<br />
<br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS,
<br />AMENDING SECTION 3 OF THAT ORDINANCE WHICH REGULATES AND RESTRICTS
<br />THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND LAND, DATED MAY
<br />23,1966 (VOL. 32) BY CHANGIGN THE ZONING OF 2.74 ACRES IN THE J.M.
<br />VERI\MENDI LEAGUE NUMBER TWO, LOCATED AT 1233 LH. 35 NORTH, FROM "c"
<br />(COMMERCIAL) TO "C-2" (COMMERCIAL).
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr. Hansen moved the Ordinance be approved on second reading. Mr. James seconded
<br />the motion, which passed unanimously.
<br />
|