Laserfiche WebLink
<br />149 <br /> <br />regular meeting, november 24, 1975 <br /> <br />page two <br /> <br />The Mayor read the caption of a Resolution as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING A FIXED BASE OPERATOR'S LEASE WITH MR. AND MRS. EVERETTE <br />ROHR DOING BUSINESS AS ROHR AIRPORT SERVICES COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING <br />THE MAYOR OF SAID CITY TO EXECUTE THE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved approval of the Resolution. Mr. Sutton seconded the motion. <br />George Gilbert, chairman of the Airport Commission, stated that everything <br />concerning the lease and the Lessee seemed to be in order. John Stokes came <br />before the Council to state that he had requested a public hearing on the matter <br />but that he had not had time to prepare information which would be pertinent to I <br />the issue and that he had no more to say. On roll call, the motion to approve <br />the Resolution was unani1llous. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock read an Ordinance, the caption of which is as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN MJliRCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPrER 16, <br />"MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES AND PROVISIONSfI, ARTICLE I, BY REPEALING <br />SECTIONS 16-2 (a) AND (b) PROHIBITING THE SALE OF GLUE, CEMENT, AND <br />CERTAIN OTHER SUBSTANCES AND ENACTING A NEW SUBSECTION (al AND (b) <br />TO SEC. 16-2 PROHIBITING THE SALE OF AEROSOL PAINT CONTAINING TOLUOL <br />OR TOLUENE TO PERSONS UNDER 17 YEARS OF AGE AND REQ,UIRING COMMERCIAL <br />ESTABLISHMENTS OFFERING SUCE; SUBSTANCES FOR SALE TO REMOVE SUCH <br />SUBSTANCES FROM PUBLIC ACCESS DISPLAYS. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved approval of the Ord~nance on first reading. Mr. Sutton <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Flores stated his contention that the provision <br />requiring the removal of such substances from public access displays would work <br />a hardship on larger store owners. Joyce Bostwick presented a letter to the <br />Council from the Board of Directors of Scheib Opportunity Center in support of <br />the Ordinance. Council discussed the public access display prohibition in the <br />ordinance and reached a concensus of opinion, supported by the City Attorney, <br />that it related to self-service sales floors and not businesses where customers <br />were always assisted by sales personnel. On roll call, the vote was recorded <br />as follows: <br /> <br />AYE: <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Breihan, Craddock, Hansen, Sutton> Arredondo <br />Flores. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Mayor introduced for consideration a program of usage for the Cock House. <br />Mr. Flores moved to instruct the City Manager to prepare an ordinance placing <br />the Cock House under the jurisdiction of the City of San Marcos Parks and <br />Recreation Department; further, all groups wishing to use this facility must <br />schedule such usage through the Parks and Recreation Department; finally, a use <br />fee be imposed sufffidient to cover utilities, opening and closing, and clean up <br />and that such fee be deferred until January 1, 1977. Mr. Hansen seconded the <br />motion. Mr. Sutton stated that he wanted it understood that, since the City would <br />assume the cost of operating the building during the year 1976, the Bicentennial <br />Commission would request no further funding for their activities to be carried out <br />in the Cock House. Mrs. Oltman, representing the Commission, assured the Council <br />that the proposal under discussion was agreeable to the Commission and they would <br />assist the City as much as possible in keeping the building open to the public. <br />Reverend H. Ellis Thomas informed the Council that the newly formed Heritage Commission <br />planned to return any income from use of the house to projects which would benefit <br />the City. On roll' call, Mr. Flores' motion was unanimously approved. <br /> <br />The Mayor introduced for consideration the award of contract for the Willow Creek <br />Drainage Project. The City Manager informed the Council that all firms submitting <br />bids had been checked out and were qualified to perform the work and were fiscally <br />sound. He further stated that the staff recommended the contract be awarded <br />Wagner Construction on the basis of that company having submitted the lowest and best <br />bid, including alternates. Mr. Hansen moved the contract be awarded Wagner Construc.,:' <br />tion, alternates l'and 2 included, at a price of $157,924.42. Mr. Flores seconded <br />the motton. Mr. Breihan requested the Council consider requesting additional design <br />work. be done to determine the feasibility of leaving the Ellis Street crossing open <br />for through traffic. By common consent, the Council requested such a study. They <br />were informed by the City Manager that such work would come at the end of the project <br />as presently planned, and that the study could easily be arranged by the staff to be <br />approved by the Council at a later date. On roll call, the motion to approve the <br />awarding of the contract passed unanimously. <br /> <br />.1 <br />