My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10111965 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1960 s
>
1965
>
10111965 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 1:49:24 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 11:08:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
10/11/1965
Volume Book
31
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />if <br /> <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />CUH o{ San ~arcos <br /> <br />P. O. Box 725 <br /> <br />TELEPHONE: Arell Code 512 <br />EXport 2-2418 <br /> <br />Sa" ..JJ1<<I'co., c:JeJta., 78666 <br /> <br />OFFICE OFTHE MA VCR <br /> <br />13 October 1965 <br /> <br />TO: Hon. Mark Whittenberg, Mayor Pro-Tem <br />Alderman Caesar Damon <br />Alderman Joe Froh <br />Alderman William C. Pool <br />Alderman A. G. Tuttle <br /> <br />Gentlemen: <br /> <br />At the Council meeting of October 11, 1965, Alderman Whittenberg <br />introduced a resolution and move.d tithe Council go on record <br />to instruct the LPA to conclude the Chatauqua Hill Project, <br />and not to receive any new projects; to conclude and liquidate <br />their business and close their office." A majority of the <br />Couuc.i 1 voted "Aye. rr <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I feel I am morally obligated to exercise my power of veto on <br />the Council's action of October 11, 1965. I have registered <br />my veto with the City Secretary, in accordance with provision <br />of the statutes. <br /> <br />I have the responsibility to consider the City as a whole, and <br />the future betterment which could result from properly exe- <br />cuted Urban Renewal projects would, in my opinion, benefit <br />the whole. <br /> <br />In support of this veto I submit: <br /> <br />(1) Previous administrations of this City have <br />been criticized for their lack of planning and <br />development of the river; <br /> <br />(2) The provision of adequate parks and the con- <br />servation of river frontage for public use has been <br />of concern to the City Administration, civic groups, <br />and individuals; <br /> <br />(3) The electorate of the City of San Marcos ap- <br />proved development through urban renewal projects <br />by a majority of eight-and-a-half to one; <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(4) One of the factors influencing this favorable <br />vote was the acquisition of the west bank of the <br />San Marcos River and its use for civic and recrea- <br />tional development; <br /> <br />(5) It is believed the interest of the majority <br />of the citizens can best be served through a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.