My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07101967 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1960 s
>
1967
>
07101967 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 3:36:26 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 11:09:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
7/10/1967
Volume Book
34
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />KYLE AND WALKER <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />liENRY C. KYLE <br />ALBERT M. WALKER <br />H.C_KYLE,m <br /> <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAw <br />....._P..___~..,~~""MW<r East Side of Square <br />SAN MARGaS, TEXAS <br /> <br />July 6, 1967 <br /> <br />City Council <br />City of San Marcos <br />City Hall <br />San Marcos, Texas <br /> <br />Attention: Mrs. Worrell <br /> <br />Dr. Craddock and Gentlemen: <br /> <br />Judge Ben A. Copass and I are very seriously concerned as <br />to the apparent absence of legal authority for the placement of <br />traffic-control devices at the various street intersections <br />within our city. This absence was brought to mind most pain- <br />fully by the recent necessity of dismissing a charge of dis- <br />regarding one of such signals. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Said charge had been filed in the Corporation Court. The <br />facts were certain. The defendent entered an intersection after <br />the yellow light had begun to flash. He failed to clear the <br />intersection before the red light began to flash. Thus, he <br />was patently guilty of a violation of Section 33 of Article <br />670ld of the State Statutes and Section 36 (b) of the San Marcos <br />Ordinance located in Volume 11, pages 364-396, of the Council <br />Minutes. <br /> <br />Why then was dismissal effected? Simply and painfully <br />because the particular traffic-control at this particular inter- <br />section was erected without legal authority. At the time of <br />the erection, said intersection was a part of U. S. Highway 81. <br />It is now a part of State Highway Loop 82. Section 30 (b) of <br />Article 670ld reads as follows: "No local authority shall place <br />or maintain any traffic-control device upon any highway under <br />the jurisdiction of the State Highway Department except by the <br />latter's permission." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I am informed by the local representative of the State <br />Highway Department that never at any time has his bureau author- <br />ized the erection or maintenance of the particular signal light <br />in question. By pure surmise, therefore, it would seem that <br />the light was erected by City of San Marcos personnel. As to <br />authority, very possibly the Commission or Council of that day <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.