|
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 1977 -517
<br />
<br />AN ORDINANCE OF '!BE CITY COUNCIL OF '!BE CIty OF
<br />SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING '!BE PRICE AND
<br />CONDITIONS OF '!BE SAlE BY '!BE CITY OF SAN MARCOS,
<br />TEXAS, OF LOT 65 OF '!BE RIVERSIDE ADDITION, ALSO
<br />KNOWN AS URBAN RENEWAL PARCEL NO. l'+D-13, LOCATED
<br />WITHIN '!BE TEX. A-6, NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT
<br />PROGRAM AREA, TO BALTAZAR AND ROSA SAENZ; AUTHORIZ-
<br />ING '!BE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A WARRANTY DEED TO BALTAZAR
<br />AND ROSA SAENZ; AND DEClARING AN EMERGENCY.
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the City of San Marcos, Texas, advertised for bids for the sale
<br />of that certain real property known as Let 65 of the Riverside Addition,
<br />also known as Urban Renewal Parcel No. 14D-13, located within the Tex.
<br />A-6, Neighborhood Development Program area, in the San Marcos Record, a
<br />local newspaper with a general circulation in the County of Hays, Stat'e
<br />of Texas; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, pursuant to said advertisement a bid was submitted by Baltazar
<br />and Rosa Saenz for said Let 65 of the Riverside Addition; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the said bid met the minimum disposition price set upon said
<br />property by the Board of Corrmissioners of the Urban Renewal Agency of
<br />the City of San Marcos, Texas; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the said Board accepted the bid as the highest and best responsible
<br />bid for said property by a motion duly passed on November 1, 1977, after
<br />the bid opening of November 1, 1977; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, said motion also approved the teTIJ1S and conditions for the sale
<br />of the said property and recorrmended the approval of said purchase pri.ce
<br />and the approval of the terms and conditions for the sale, as contained in
<br />the bid documents, by the City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the aforementioned bid and proposed use set forth in said bid and
<br />the sales teTIJ1S and conditions pertinent thereto conform to the Redevelopment
<br />Plan for the development of the City as a whole; now, therefore,
<br />
<br />BE IT ORDAINED BY '!BE CITY COUNCIL OF '!BE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS:
<br />
<br />Section 1. That the terms and conditions of the sale by the City of
<br />San Marcos, Texas, of Let 65 of the Riverside Addition, also known as
<br />Urban Renewal Parcel No. 14 D-13, to Baltazar and Rosa Saenz, are hereby
<br />approved. '
<br />
<br />Section 2. That the consideration for the sale for said property being
<br />$3,125.00 for 7,812.50 square feet is hereby approv~d.
<br />
<br />Section 3. That the sale by the City of San Marcos is made subj ect to
<br />restrictions of the Redevelopment Plan for the Tex. A-6, Neighborhood
<br />Development Program, as approved and amended, said plan in on file and
<br />is available for inspection in the Office of the Director of Corrrnunity
<br />Development of the City of San Marcos.
<br />
<br />Section 4. That the conditions of the disposition documents, including
<br />the Deed and Contract for Sale for Private Redevelopment, are on file
<br />and are available for inspection in the Office of the Director of
<br />Corrmunity Development of the City of San Marcos.
<br />
<br />Sect ion 5. That the purchaser is hereby placed on notice that the SU)j ect
<br />property is subject to assessment under the provisions of Article 1l05b
<br />of the Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas.
<br />
<br />Section 6. That the Mayor of the City of San Marcos, Texas, is hereby
<br />authorized to execute a warranty deed to Baltazar and Rosa Saenz from
<br />the City of San Marcos, for all that real property known as Let 65 of
<br />the Riverside Addition, also known as Urban Renewal Parcel No. 14D-13,
<br />located within the Tex. A-6, Neighborhood Development Program.
<br />
<br />Section 7. That the importance of this Ordinance creates an emergency
<br />and an imperative purpose necessary that the provisions of the Charter
<br />requiring all ordinances be read at three separate meetings and that no
<br />ordinance shall become effective until the expiration of 10 days
<br />following the date of its final passage, be suspended, and this provision
<br />
|