My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1973-005
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1970 s
>
1973
>
Res 1973-005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2008 9:12:34 AM
Creation date
8/26/2008 9:12:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
Number
1973-5
Date
3/12/1973
Volume Book
42
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />13'A <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF YEAR IV ACTIVITIES FOR <br />THE N.D.P. TEX. A-6, SAN MARCOS, TEXAS <br /> <br />The planning process for Year IV activities has been <br /> <br />coordinated by the Agency's Staff after receiving valuable <br /> <br />input from various segments of the community, including: <br /> <br />the Tex. A-6 Project Area Committee, the Urban Renewal Board <br /> <br />of Commissioners, Planning Consultants, City Staff, and the <br /> <br />local citizenry. This input was assembled into a package <br /> <br />which the Agency felt would do the most for the project <br /> <br />residents and still stay within the guidelines provided <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. <br /> <br />Basically, the package consists of a series of project <br /> <br />improvements, which were designed in such a way that they <br /> <br />would improve the quality of life in the program area and <br /> <br />in the entire City as well. The first aspect of this <br /> <br />program involves the services provided directly to the <br /> <br />program area residents - the rebuilding of neighborhood <br /> <br />streets. These improvements were necessary for many <br /> <br />reasons: poor drainage, high maintenance costs, poor <br /> <br />service, and decreased property values to local residents. <br /> <br />Each of these reasons would almost stand alone as reason <br /> <br />enough for the Agency to provide these improvementsl and <br /> <br />together they make up an overwhelming argument that cannot <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />be disagreed with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.