My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08032010 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2010's
>
2010
>
08032010 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2017 4:06:26 PM
Creation date
7/22/2010 12:04:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
8/3/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Description of Research <br />A) Research Objectives <br />The epikarst, often called the "skin" of karst aquifers, is a critical zone which controls hydrological <br />fluxes, water quality of recharge, and ecosystem function. It is a variably weathered transition zone <br />between the soil and un- weathered bedrock in the vadose zone that has enhanced porosity and functions <br />to store and direct percolating water towards vertical drains or springs in the karst (Jones et al. 2004). <br />Traditionally, the study of epikarst has been the purview of hydrogeologists primarily concerned with <br />epikarst evolution and hydrological characterization. However, in recent years, the epikarst was <br />"discovered" by ecologists with an interest in understanding the unique ecology of karst regions. Studies <br />at the interface of hydrogeology and ecology are important and timely because of growing concerns over <br />groundwater quantity and quality in regions simultaneously threatened by vegetation change (e.g. woody <br />encroachment), urbanization and climate change. <br />According to the Karst Waters Institute, the Edwards Aquifer of central Texas is among the top ten <br />most threatened karst aquifers in the world. Fortunately, the Edwards Plateau has also become a focal <br />point for conducting multidisciplinary research into karst processes. This proposal will make an <br />important contribution to these efforts by addressing two of the major uncertainties in epikarst <br />hydroecology:1) Where in the soil /epikarst system are the roots of the major water consumers (trees) <br />located and how do trees interact with groundwater recharge flows? While the first studies on root <br />ecology of the region placed roots deep in the fractured rock, tapping directly into pooled cave water <br />(Jackson et al. 1999), more recent studies questioned whether the "deep root' scenario can be uncritically <br />generalized across the karst landscape (Wilcox, 2005). 2) What is the fate of contaminants applied to the <br />surface of the soil /epikarst system? Nitrogen contamination of karst aquifers through the encroachment of <br />cities into aquifer recharge zones is a worldwide problem (Legrand, 1973) but the processes of nitrogen <br />transport, storage and removal through biological processes are not well understood. <br />Epikarst is notoriously heterogeneous, related to geologic properties and the circumstances of <br />epikarst evolution. While this presents challenges to karst research, it is also an opportunity for exploring <br />the structural determinants of epikarst hydrological and ecological function. Our approach here is to <br />capitalize on epikarst heterogeneity by examining hydro - ecological processes as a function of soil and <br />epikarst thickness and structure. At six sites spanning a range of soil depths, epikarst thickness, and <br />bedrock characteristics, we will address the following questions: 1) How does the structure of the <br />soil /epikarst system affect the dynamics of water flow? 2) How does it affect the dynamics and location <br />of water uptake in trees? 3) Using ammonium nitrate as a model contaminant, how does soil /epikarst <br />structure affect contaminant transport, retention and removal? Our working hypothesis is that a positive <br />relationship exists between the residence time of water in the soil/epikarst system, and both utilization of <br />epikarst water by trees and the capacity of plants and soil biota to intercept ammonium nitrate inputs. <br />While it may be obvious that thicker soil cover will have these effects, it is less obvious whether thicker <br />epikarst, which could also increase the residence time of water and contaminants, may have a similar <br />effect and could thus compensate for a lack of soil cover. <br />The research proposed here is not funded through any other source and is the first collaboration <br />between Schwartz and Schwinning. However, the proposed research builds upon the independent <br />research experiences of both PIs. Schwartz, with collaborators from Virginia Tech, U.S.G.S., American <br />University, and the Karst Research Institute in Slovenia, is currently conducting a study in Virginia to <br />investigate epikarst controls on recharge quantity and quality under an agricultural field by monitoring <br />and analyzing cave drip - waters. This study is the first to integrate long -term high - resolution monitoring <br />of cave drip rates and geochemistry, and surface environmental conditions, for the purposes of <br />characterizing epikarst flow and transport. The study also employs copepod analysis of drip waters, an <br />emerging technique in the study of soil/epikarst flow regimes. Copepods are small crustaceans that live in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.