Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Considering projected ultimate operational activity, the 65 DNL noise contour <br />encompasses approximately 331 acres as depicted on Exhibit B. The primary reason <br />for the decrease is due to a projected decrease use of the airport by older, louder <br />corporate aircraft. <br /> <br />COMPATIBLE LAND USE <br /> <br />Federal Aviation Regulations (F.A.R.) Part 150 recommends guidelines for planning <br />land use compatibility within various levels of aircraft noise exposure as summarized <br />on Exhibit C. As the name indicates, these are guidelines only; F.A.R. Part 150 <br />explicitly states that determinations of noise compatibility and regulation ofland use <br />are purely local responsibilities. Based upon the results of the noise modeling efforts, <br />the 65 DNL noise contour is expected to remain on airport. <br /> <br />The primary goal of compatible lan~ use planning is to achieve and maintain <br />compatibility between the airport and its surrounding community. Inherent in this <br />goal is the assurance that the airport can maintain or expand its size and level of <br />operations to satisfy existing and future aviation demand. The protection of the <br />investment in a facility such as an airport is of great importance. At the same time, <br />a person who lives, works, or owns property near an airport should be able to enjoy the <br />location without infringement by noise or other adverse impacts of the airport. <br /> <br />SOCIAL IMPACTS <br /> <br />Social impacts known to result from airport improvement projects are often associated <br />with the relocation of residences and businesses or other community disruptions. <br />Primary development ofthe proposed improvements at San Marcos Municipal Airport <br />is not expected to result in the relocation or removal of a residence or business. <br /> <br />The proposed land acquisition as a part of airport development is only avigational <br />easement where residences are concerned. The acquisition of easement will not require <br />the displacement of residents or businesses. Other land acquisition should not require <br />the acquisition and relocation of residences. The proposed development and associated <br />land acquisition are not anticipated to divide or disrupt an established community, <br />interfere with orderly planned development, or create a short-term, appreciable change <br />in employment. <br /> <br />FAA Order 5050AA provides that where the relocation of a residence, business, or <br />farmland is involved, the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and <br />Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URARP AP A) must be met. The <br />Act requires that home owners and tenants be offered assistance in finding a new home <br />or new site, and in relocation costs. Relocation assistance includes help in finding a <br />comparable replacement dwelling which meets the FAA's "decent, safe, and sanitary" <br />criteria and in moving costs. Due to the developing nature of the San Marcos and <br /> <br />A-5 <br />