My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2001-006
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2002
>
Res 2001-006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2007 3:28:04 PM
Creation date
10/11/2005 3:41:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
Number
2001-06
Date
1/14/2002
Volume Book
146
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~. <br />r. > ~ I... 'c r..: :'Jl~ '.:' <br />~i~r - r~ f <br />""-- ~ -- " <br />OECA <br />C'!letdE*~m <br />c~~ k:sS;1"1nl:1J <br /> <br />Current E!S <br />Documents <br />Available for <br />Review <br /> <br />Summaries of <br />EPA Comments <br />on EISs <br /> <br />Where to File <br />an E1S <br /> <br />EIS Activitv . <br />Statistics <br /> <br />NEPA <br />Comoliance <br />for EPA Activities <br /> <br />Related Laws. <br />ReQulations <br />and Guidance <br /> <br />NEPA Staff <br />Contacts <br /> <br />AQencv NEPA <br />Websltes <br /> <br />Anta rctica <br />Environmental <br />~ <br />Assessment <br /> <br />International <br />Enforcement <br />and Comollance <br /> <br />. of2 <br /> <br />....-. ,...,....I!. .. nr::J:..cs.cpa.gov'oec:l/o!'aJratJn:!.. <br /> <br /> <br />d'Jr. E- <br />'0 ~ <br />1J.~!tl'd ~*~ - <br />.f.:'e);~~r~tr.;~~,,*1 <br />"''"~,,~. <br /> <br />Summary of EPA Rating Definitions <br /> <br />· EPA's rating system was ceveloped as c ."T1eans to summa:-z~ EPA:s level of concern <br />with a proposed action. <br /> <br />. The ratings are a combination of alphace::cal categories tra: sigmr'f EPA's evaluation of <br />the environmental impacrs of the proposal and numerical ca:=gones that signify an <br />evaluation of the adequacy of the EIS. <br /> <br />Environmental Impact of the Action <br /> <br />"LO" (Lack of Objections) <br /> <br />The EPA review has not identified any potential environmenta' impacts requiring <br />substantive changes to the proposal. The review may have disclose: opportunities for <br />application of mitigation measures that could be accomplished wltn -0 more than minor <br />changes to the proposal. <br /> <br />"EC" (Environmental Concerns) <br /> <br />The EPA review has identified environmental impacts that s~: ~Id be avoided in order to <br />fully protect the environment. Corrective measures may require cha.-:ges to the preferred <br />alternative or application of mitigation measures that can reduce tne environmental impact. <br />EPA would like to work with the lead agency to reduce these impac:s. <br /> <br />"EO" (Environmental Objections) <br /> <br />The EPA review has identified significant environmental impa::s that must be avoided in <br />order to provide adequate protection for the enVlronment. Corrective measures may require <br />substantial changes to the preferred alternative or consideration of s::me other project <br />alternative (including the no action alternative or a new alternative. E?A intends to work with <br />the lead agency to reduce these impacts. <br /> <br />"EU" (Environmentally Unsatisfactory) <br /> <br />The EPA review has identified adverse environmental impacr:s that are of sufficient <br />magnitude that they are unsatisfactory from the standpoint of public r.ealth or welfare or <br />environmental quality. EPA intends to work with the lead agency to reduce these impacts. If <br />the potentially unsatisfactory impacts are not corrected at the final E:S stage, this proposal will <br />be recommended for referral to the CEQ. <br /> <br />Adequacy of the Impact Statement <br /> <br />"Category 1" (Adequate) <br /> <br />EPA believes the draft EIS adequately sets forth the environmental impact(s) of the <br />preferred alternative and those of the alternatives reasonably available to the project or action. <br />No further analysis or data collection is necessary, but the reviewer may suggest the addition <br />of clarifying language or information. <br /> <br />A-45 <br /> <br />4/6/00 12:08 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.