Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />The San Marcos River is the heart of the City of San Marcos. Citizens love their river with its clear, spring - <br />fed water, riverside parks, and endangered species. Some might even say it's getting "loved to death." <br />Recreation use is seen by some as a potential threat to the health of the river. Recreationists <br />overwhelmingly rank their day at the river as a great experience, and the crowds there may even add to <br />the fun of enjoying river play. <br />The City of San Marcos Community Services Department - Parks and Recreation and Texas State <br />University's River Systems Institute partnered with the National Park Service's Rivers, Trails and <br />Conservation Assistance Program to study the amount and kinds of use of the river, the opinions of <br />recreationists and citizens at large, and the impacts on the water quality and endangered species. Using <br />the help of "experts" in various fields of recreation and resource protection, along with citizen <br />suggestions, the partners then developed a set of recommendations that if adopted would constitute a <br />Management Plan for River Recreation in the San Marcos River Corridor within the City Limits. The ideas <br />for balancing recreation with resource protection were developed for the river corridor within the City <br />Limits. <br />ISSUES <br />Concerns about the river were collected in several ways. In 2006, the three partners exploring river <br />management held a community workshop attended by approximately 50 people from diverse <br />community groups, City and University departments, landowners, resource agencies, recreationists, and <br />others. Identified issues fell into several categories: impacts from recreation users' behavior, impacts on <br />the river from non - recreation activities that occur within the watershed and in the riparian areas, and <br />the needs for physical improvements. <br />Some examples of river issues from the workshop include: <br />• Intense use of spillway <br />• Overcrowding <br />• Too much hard bank stabilization <br />• No overall interpretative plan <br />• Need for bilingual signage and education <br />• Lack of public information on regulations <br />• Increasing impervious cover in watershed (and non -point source pollution) <br />• Trash dumping in and around the river and watershed <br />• Protection of Spring Lake buffer and aquifer recharge areas <br />• Inappropriate plantings in the floodplain <br />• Need comprehensive enforcement, fines, curfews <br />• Pedestrian safety concerns. <br />A random - sample survey of San Marcos citizens, conducted in 2008 as part of the Parks and Open Space <br />Planning effort, asked respondents to comment on how problematic is each listed recreation issue. Their <br />answers follow on Table A.1. <br />109 <br />