My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2002-074
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2002
>
Res 2002-074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2006 9:11:39 AM
Creation date
6/26/2006 9:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2002-74
Date
4/8/2002
Volume Book
147
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has recently revised TEX. LOCAL GOy'T CODE <br /> <br /> <br />Chapter 242 (7ih Leg., Ch. 1028 [H.B. No. 1445]) to limit subdivision regulation within <br /> <br /> <br />the ETJ to one entity; and <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, under TEX. LOCAL GOy'T CODE Chapter 242, the COUNTY and the <br /> <br /> <br />CITY are required to enter into a written agreement that identifies the governmental <br /> <br /> <br />entity authorized to regulate subdivision plats and approve related permits in the ETJ of <br />the CITY within the COUNTY; and <br />WHEREAS, under TEX. LOCAL GOV'T CODE Chapter 242, the COUNTY and the <br />CITY are required to enter into said written agreement on or before April 1, 2002; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is not to adopt or enact new <br /> <br />requirements or regulations for subdivisions, but rather to fulfill the intent of the recent <br /> <br />revisions to TEX. LOCAL GOy'T CODE Chapter 242, to reduce "unnecessary expenses and <br /> <br />delays for property owners because municipalities and counties have different standards, <br /> <br />requirements, and levels of authority over subdivisions" (77th Leg., Ch. l028 [H.B. No. <br /> <br />1445], bill analysis); and <br />WHEREAS, to the extent that the CITY's execution of this Agreement and <br /> <br />related agreements with other counties in other areas of the CITY's ETJ, or the CITY's <br /> <br />adoption, administration or enforcement of ordinances, rules, regulations or plans III <br /> <br />reasonable furtherance of this Agreement or the related agreements results III <br /> <br />requirements or restrictions that are not identical throughout the CITY's entire ETJ, the <br /> <br />parties jointly acknowledge that the actions of the CITY are "reasonably taken to fulfill <br /> <br />an obligation mandated by state law" within the meaning of TEX. GOy'T CODE Section <br /> <br />2007.003(b)(4), and are therefore not subject to TEX. GOy'T CODE Chapter 2007; and <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.