My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2002-213
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2002
>
Res 2002-213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2006 9:28:09 AM
Creation date
7/3/2006 9:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2002-213
Date
11/25/2002
Volume Book
150
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Austin/San Marcos MSA Response <br />The region is volunteering to participate in the EAC Protocol process to expedite air cleanup for <br />future public health and welfare. The Austin/San Marcos MSA Response has two components: <br /> <br />1. The Early Action Compact (EAC) - The EAC is a Memorandum of Agreement to prepare <br />and implement the Clean Air Action Plan. More specifically, the EAC sets measurable, <br />enforceable milestones for developing and implementing the Clean Air Action Plan. <br />2. The Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) - The CAAP serves as the region's official air quality <br />improvement plan, with quantified emission-reduction measures. The CAAP will include all <br />necessary elements of a comprehensive air quality plan, (like the plans in Dallas or <br />Houston), but will be tailored to local needs and driven by local decisions. Moreover, the <br />CAAP will be incorporated into the formal SIP and the region will be legally required to carry <br />out this plan just as in nonattainment areas. For example, development of the CAAP will <br />require the same scientific diligence and undergo the same scrutiny as the nonattainment <br />areas' SIPs, so that the emission reduction strategies selected will be adequate to ensure <br />the region stays in attainment of the 8-hour standard. <br /> <br />EAC Protocol Versus Traditional Nonattainment <br />A major advantage of the region's participation in the EAC Protocol is the flexibility afforded to <br />the signatories in selecting emission reduction measures and programs that are best suited to <br />local needs and circumstances. Recognizing the varied socioeconomic and emissions <br />characteristics within the region, not all measures can or should be implemented by every entity. <br /> <br />The primary differences between the process outlined in the EAC Protocol and the traditional <br />nonattainment area process are: <br />· EAC Protocol is designed to achieve clean air sooner than expected under the traditional <br />nonattainment process 1. <br />· EAC Protocol allows for more local control in selecting emission-reduction measures. <br />· EAC Protocol ensures deferral of the effective date of nonattainment designation and <br />related requirements, as long as EAC terms and milestones are met. This would <br />alleviate any stigma associated with a nonattainment designation. <br /> <br />Should any milestones be missed in designing or implementing the CAAP, the region would <br />automatically revert to the traditional nonattainment requirements, with appropriate credit given <br />for emission reduction strategies already implemented. <br /> <br />1 Under the traditional nonattainment process, emissions reduction strategies are unlikely to be <br />implemented before 2007. Under the EAC Protocol, emissions reduction strategies will be fully <br />implemented by 2005. <br /> <br />III <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.