Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ 9.11 <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Wireless revenues will absorb a portion of the expenditures that are <br />related to 9-1-1 costs. The Commission has not determined the <br />allowable, reimbursable activities for wireless service fee but will be <br />making those decisions in the near future as wireless solutions become <br />apparent. It was further stated that a proportionate share of wireless <br />fees will offset some of the day to day costs. <br /> <br />Letter on population distribution <br /> <br />Reference: ACSEC policy <br /> <br />Source: <br /> <br />Policy: <br /> <br />9 9.12 <br />Subject: <br /> <br />August 8, 1997 letter to the City of Addison <br /> <br />ACSEC stated that it is not able to alter the distribution of wireless fees <br />due the unilateral adoption in HB 2129 which was a negotiated decision <br />representing a variety of different community interests, primarily the <br />wireless industry in Texas. In closing it was stated that, distributing <br />wireless funds based on population was the fairest most equitable <br />means. <br /> <br />Wireless distribution method <br /> <br />Reference: ACSEC policy <br /> <br />Source: <br /> <br />Policy: <br /> <br />June 10, 1997 letter to regional council <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry as to whether wireless service fee can be <br />distributed based on jurisdictional boundaries. ACSEC's policy requires <br />that service fee remittance be based on zip code and the billing address <br />of the customer. In regards to receiving funds that do not fall within the <br />regional council's area of remittance, it was advised that the regional <br />council contact th e other affected 9-1-1 entities and resolve any zip code <br />disputes and/or questions. ACSEC has maintained that the 9-1-1 <br />organizations involved should solve any problems that have resulted in <br />over or under payment of fees. <br /> <br />ACSEC Policies and Procedures <br />February 1999 <br /> <br />Page 35 <br />