Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />co <br />N <br /> <br />C.) <br />(~ <br /> <br />.. <br />~ <br />- <br /> <br />0 :-. <br />;::; c.... <br />'<0 c: ~i1 <br />o- r <br />--I \,- <br />00-< I-" qr <br />1>>(') <br />:] r- cc !:!om <br />s:m I') ~ <br />I>>:D Cj <br />n" Cj <br />0 en ~ <br />en <br /> <br />c.L <br /> <br />::"':': ,}- <br />-. J! <br />,,-,".- ~ <br />. C.) ~ <br />-- !,- <~ <br />;)' 0- l' <br />\.~ 1 <br />1"'- ' <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, SETTING THE TAX RATE FOR THE <br />2006 TAX YEAR; LEVYING TAXES FOR THE USE AND <br />SUPPORT OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF THE <br />CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, <br />2006, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2007; PROVIDING A <br />SINKING FUND FOR THE RETIREMENT OF THE BONDED <br />DEBT OF THE CITY; INCLUDING PROCEDURAL <br />PROVISIONS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 2006- 42 <br /> <br />r- <br />I <br />0- <br />W <br />en <br />~ <br />C=> <br />C=> <br />c-..., <br /> <br />- <br />c.) ."- <br />OJ <br /> <br />RECITALS: <br /> <br />1. The Chief Appraiser of the Hays Central Appraisal District has prepared and certified <br />the appraisal roll for the City, being that portion of the approved appraisal roll of the Hays <br />Central Appraisal District which lists property taxable by the City. <br /> <br />2. The Tax Assessor for the City has performed the statutory calculations required by <br />Section 26.04 of the Texas Tax Code, and has publicized the effective tax rate, the rollback tax <br />rate, and an explanation of how they were calculated, and has fulfilled all other requirements for <br />publication as contained in Section 26.04(e) of the Tax Code, in a manner designed to come to <br />the attention of all residents of the City, and has submitted the rates to the City Council. <br /> <br />3. The City Council discussed the tax rate for the 2006 tax year at its meeting on August <br />15, 2006, and at that meeting the Council agreed to consider a proposed tax rate of 47. 02~ per <br />$100 of the taxable value, a rate that exceeded the effective tax rate, and the City Council <br />directed the staff to schedule public hearings on August 28th and August 3151 to discuss the <br />proposed tax rate. <br /> <br />4. Notice of the public hearings on the proposed tax rate was published in accordance <br />with applicable requirements of State law in the San Marcos Daily Record on August 20, 2006. <br /> <br />5. The City Council held public hearings on August 28th and August 31 5t (each being a <br />weekday that was not a public holiday) to discuss the proposed tax rate at San Marcos City Hall, <br />a publicly owned building within the City to which the public normally has access. At each of the <br />hearings, the City Council afforded adequate opportunity for proponents and opponents of the tax <br />increase to present their views, and after each of the hearings, the City Council announced the <br />date, time and location of the public meeting at which the vote on adoption of the tax rate was to <br />occur. <br /> <br />6. Notice of the scheduled City Council vote on the proposed tax rate was published in <br />accordance with applicable requirements of State law in the San Marcos Daily Record on <br />September 3, 2006. <br />