Res 2007-039 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. Under the first proposal of the EAA Plan, the total amount of authorized permits I would increase by 22%. This increase could lead to a sustained increase in reliance on the Edwards Aquifer that when combined with the proposed critical period reduction "floor" of 340,000 acre-feet per year would likely, in dry periods, lead to cessation of the flow of the Comal Springs, and perhaps even the San Marcos Springs. This would mean that downstream interests would have little to no river flow while at the same time Edward's pumpers would be guaranteed 75% of their current permit amounts. 5. The first two proposals in the EAA Plan represent a significant departure from the original intent of the EAA Act, tipping the balance dramatically towards those who rely on the Aquifer pumping at the expense of those who rely on Aquifer spring flows. 6. The third proposal of the EAA Plan flies in the face of the entire reason for increasing the permit cap, that is, to eliminate any need for compensation related to permit reductions. Compared with the existing provisions of the EAA Act which make EAA permit holders responsible for any needed compensation for (a) the reduction from 549,000 to 450,000 acre-feet, and (b) one-half of the reduction from 450,000 to 400,000 acre-feet, with Guadalupe basin permit holders responsible for the other half of the reduction from 450,000 to 400,000 acre-feet, the EAA proposal would increase the cost share burden for Guadalupe basin permit holders from 17% to 50%. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I SAN MARCOS, TEXAS: Part 1: The City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas strongly supports all efforts to protect he Edwards Aquifer from overuse, including maintaining pumping caps in legislation. Part 2: The City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas strongly supports the efforts of the Guadalupe Basin Coalition to enable legislation to protect Spring Flows, particularly during periods of drought, with inclusion of spring flows as critical period reduction triggers. Part 3: The City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas opposes legislation that would increase the total acre-feet of water pumped from the Edwards Aquifer above 450,000 acre-feet per year. Part 4: The City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas strongly opposes any legislation that would increase payment by downstream Guadalupe Basin permit holders for reductions in pumping capacity by current EAA permit holders. Part 5: The City Council of the City of San Marcos supports participation by I stakeholders in a cooperative agreement process (Edwards Aquifer Recovery