My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1996-189
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1990 s
>
1996
>
Res 1996-189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2007 9:05:31 AM
Creation date
6/18/2007 9:05:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Grant Application
Number
1996-189
Date
10/28/1996
Volume Book
126
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~ hfPL <br /> - <br /> as an application is submitted to the non-supplanting requirement of the <br /> COPS Office. If the SPOC requires a copy Public Safety partnerslúp and Community <br /> of the COPS MORE application, the Policing Act of 1994. The certifications <br /> applicant should still send the original will be treated as a material representation <br /> application and two copies to the COPS of fact upon which reliance will be <br /> Office. placed by the U.s. Department of Justice <br /> in awarding grants. <br /> Audit Requirement . . <br /> Civil Rights <br /> The Single Audit Act of 1984, issued in <br /> OMB Circular A-128, "Audits of State All recipients of Federal grant funds are <br /> and Local Governments," or A-133, required to comply with nondiscrimina- <br /> "Audits of Institutions of Higher Learning tion requirements contained in various <br /> and Other Non-Profit Institutions," Federal laws. All applicants should consult <br /> established. the requirements for organi- the assurances to understand the applic- <br /> zationa1 audits that apply to COPS able legal and administrative require- <br /> grantees. The required audits are to be ments. <br /> on an organization-wide basis - rather <br /> than grant-by-grant - and must be Suspension Of Tennination of Funding <br /> arranged for by the grantee in accordance <br /> with the requirements of the circular. The COPS Office may ~uspend, in whole <br /> or in part, or terminate funding for, or <br /> Certifications: impo.se other sanctions on a grantee for <br /> . Lobbying the following reasons: <br /> . Debannent, Suspension, and . Failure to substantially comply with <br /> Other Responsibility Matters the requirements or statutory objec- <br /> . Drug-Free Wor1<place tives of the Public Safety Partnerslúp <br /> Requirements and Community Policing Act of <br /> . Coordination and Non- 1994, program guidelines issued <br /> Supplanting Requirements thereunder, or other provisions of <br /> Federal law; or <br /> Applicants should refer to the certification . Failure to make satisfactory progress <br /> form in the application kit to determine <br /> the certification(s) to which they are toward the goals or strategies set <br /> required to attest. Applicants also should forth in this application; or <br /> review the instructions for certification <br /> included in the regulations referred to in . Failure to adhere to grant agreement <br /> the certification form. Signature of this requirements or special conditions; <br /> form provides for compliance with certi- or <br /> fication requirements under 28 CFR Part . Proposing substantial plan changes <br /> 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," and <br /> 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide to the extent that, if originally sub- <br /> Debarment and Suspension (Non- mitted, would not be selected for <br /> procurement) and Government-wide funding; or <br /> Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace . Failure to submit reports; or <br /> (Grants)," and with the coordination and <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.