My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord 2007-035
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
02 Ordinances
>
2000 s
>
2007
>
Ord 2007-035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2008 10:48:15 AM
Creation date
6/22/2007 3:07:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Ordinances
City Clerk - Type
Certificates of Obligation
Number
2007-35
Date
6/19/2007
Volume Book
172
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(b) The provisions of this Article are for the sole benefit of the Owners and beneficial owners of <br />the Certificates, and nothing m this Article, express or implied, shall give any benefit or any legal or equitable <br />right, remedy, or claim hereunder to any other person. The City undertakes to provide only the financial <br />information, operating data, financial statements, and notices which it has expressly agreed to provide pursuant <br />to this Article and does not hereby undertake to provide any other infonmation that may be relevant or material <br />to a complete presentation ofthe City's financial results, condition, or prospects or hereby undertake to update <br />any information provided in accordance with this Article or otherwise, except as expressly provided herein. <br />The City does not make any representation or warranty concerning such information or its usefulness to a <br />decision to invest m or sell Certificates at any future date. <br />Any filing required by this Article may be made solely with a central post office approved for such <br />purposes by the SEC, such as the Texas Municipal Advisory Council (the "MAC") as provided at <br />http~//www.disclosureusa.or~, for submission to the NRMSIRs and SID (without also separately submitting <br />such filings to the NRMSIRs and SID by some other means) so long as such filing is acceptable to the SEC. <br />UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CITY BE LIABLE TO THE OWNER OR <br />BENEFICIAL OWNER OF ANY CERTIFICATE OR ANY OTHER PERSON, IN CONTRACT OR <br />TORT, FOR DAMAGES RESULTING IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM ANY BREACH BY THE CITY, <br />WHETHER NEGLIGENT OR WITHOUT FAULT ON ITS PART, OF ANY COVENANT SPECIFIED <br />IN THIS ARTICLE, BUT EVERY RIGHT AND REMEDY OF ANY SUCH PERSON, IN CONTRACT <br />OR TORT, FOR OR ON ACCOUNT OF ANY SUCH BREACH, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY <br />PROVISION OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE CONTRARY, SHALL BE LIMITED TO AN ACTION <br />FOR MANDAMUS OR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. <br />(c) No default by the City m observing or performing its obligations under this Article shall <br />comprise a breach of or default under the Ordinance for purposes of any other provision of this Ordinance. <br />(d) Nothing in this Article is intended or shall act to disclaim, waiver, or otherwise lirrut the duties <br />ofthe City under federal state securities laws. <br />(e) The provisions of this Article may be amended by the City from time to time to adapt to <br />changed circumstances that arise from a change in legal requirements, a change in law, or a change in the <br />identity, nature, status, or type of operations of the City, but only if (1) the provisions of this Article, as so <br />amended, would have permitted an underwriter to purchase or sell Certificates in the primary offering of the <br />Certificates in compliance ~th the Rule, taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule <br />to the date of such amendment, as well as such changed circumstances, and (2) either (a) the Owners of a <br />majority m aggregate principal amount (or any greater amount required by any other provision of this <br />Ordinance that authorizes such an amendment) ofthe Outstanding Certificates consent to such amendment or <br />(b) a person that is unaffiliated with the City (such as nationally recognized bond counsel) determines that such <br />amendment will not materially impair the interests of the Owners and beneficial owners of the Certificates. <br />The City may also repeal or amend the provisions of this Article if the SEC amends or repeals the applicable <br />provisions of the Rule or any court of final ~urisdict~on enters judgment that such provisions ofthe Rule are <br />invalid, but in either case only if and to the extent that the provisions of this sentence would not prevent an <br />underwnter from lawfully purchasing or selling Certificates in the primary offenng ofthe Certificates. If the <br />City so amends the provisions of this Article, it shall include with any amended financial information or <br />operating data next provided in accordance with Section 12.02 an explanation, in narrative form, ofthe reasons <br />far the amendment and of the impact of any change in the type of financial information or operating data so <br />provided. <br />San Marcos CTRCO 20078: Ordinance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.