My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2007-113
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2007
>
Res 2007-113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2007 4:23:01 PM
Creation date
6/22/2007 3:27:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2007-113
Date
6/19/2007
Volume Book
172
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -113 R <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF CITY <br />UTILITIES TO SERVE A 30.15 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, AREA <br />PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT BY NAI-REOC PARTNERS <br />(CORRIDOR BUSINESS PARK), LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF <br />1-35 AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH POSEY ROAD; AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />RECITALS: <br /> <br />1. The City Land Development Code ("LDC") Section 2.3.1.2 requires City Council approval for the <br />extension of City Utilities in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. <br /> <br />2. NAI-REOC Partners (the "Petitioner") has submitted a petition to extend City Utilities to serve the <br />30.15 acre, more or less, tract of property described on the attached Plat and Metes and Bounds Description <br />(the "Property"), which is in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, to be developed for residential uses. <br /> <br />3. The City Council finds and determines that: <br /> <br />( a) The proposed development to be served by the extensions appears to be consistent with the Master <br />Plan; <br /> <br />(b) The extensions are proposed to be constructed in accordance with the City's Technical <br />Construction Standards and Specifications, the provisions of Chapter 86 of the City Code, and all other <br />applicable City regulations and standards; <br /> <br />(c) It appears to be feasible to annex the property, and any intervening property which is needed for <br />utility rights-of-way, to the City in a timely manner; <br /> <br />(d) It appears that the utility extensions would not compromise the City's ability to timely provide <br />adequate water or wastewater facilities to property inside the City; <br /> <br />(e) It appears that the utility extensions will not lead to premature development that cannot be served <br />efficiently and timely by roadway, drainage or park facilities; <br /> <br />(f) It appears that the utility extensions are financially feasible given the Petitioner's proposed means <br />of financing the extension; <br /> <br />(g) It appears that the utility extensions will not lead to significant degradation of water quality or <br />other environmental resources, either from construction of the water or wastewater improvements, <br />development of petitioner's land, or development of other land that may be served through the extended <br />facilities; and <br /> <br />(h) The Petitioner is not proposing to extend City wastewater facilities without utilizing City water <br />facilities. <br /> <br />4. The Petitioner's petition includes a request for annexation of the Property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.