My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1994-139
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1990 s
>
1994
>
Res 1994-139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2007 2:09:57 PM
Creation date
6/29/2007 2:09:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Grant Application
Number
1994-139
Date
9/12/1994
Volume Book
116
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> IOf J <br /> TRANSPORTATIONENHANCE~ŒNTPROGRfu~ NOMINATION <br /> Page 7 of 10 FORM <br /> D. POSSIBLE PROJECT IMPACTS. Indicate possible impacts of the proposed enhancement <br /> project on the resource categories listed below. <br /> GENERAL <br /> I <br /> . Following is a checklist of environmental factors. For each of the listed factors. answer the question of whether your proposed <br /> project would have been a Beneficial (B) effect. Neutral (N) effect. or an Adverse (A) effect. For example. would your project <br /> create any significant land-use change. or is it consistent with local plans? Would it have any beneficial or adverse economic <br /> impacts? <br /> Many transportation enhancement projects will have minor. if any. impacts on these listed factors. However. it is important that <br /> each factor be considered and your response indicated in the appropriate box. <br /> Note: Check only one box for each line. Do not skip any lines. <br /> Key (0 Impacts: B = Beneficial; N = Nelllral. A = Adverse; NfA.= NOl Applicable. <br /> FACTORS Type of Impacts B N A N/A <br /> Socio-Economic Factors Land-use Ch~Ulge/Consistency with Local Plans [X] [] [] [] <br /> Economic Impacts [Xl [] [] [] <br /> ~ <br /> Impact on Neighborhoods/Commuruty Cohesion [Xl [] [] [] <br /> Relocation of Residences/Businesses [] [X] [] [] <br /> Impacts on Churches/Schools [X] [] [] [] <br /> Title VI Impacts (i.e.. impacts to ethnic. minority [X] [] [] [] <br /> elderly. disabled. or other groups) <br /> Potential for Controversy Yes - No_X- .~ <br /> Resource Factors Section 4(f) Properties (publicIy-O\vned parks. recreation <br /> areas. wildlife and waterfowl refuges. and all historical sites <br /> (in public or private ownership) included on or eligible for <br /> the National Register of Historic Places) [X] [] [] [] <br /> Historic Sites and Districts [X] [] (J. [] <br /> Archaeological Resources [X] [] [] [] <br /> Recreation Areas [Xl [] [] [] <br /> Aquatic Prcscrves(wildIifc and waterfowl refuges) [X] [] [] [] <br /> Stream Modification [] [X] [] [] <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.