My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01.15.13 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2010's
>
2013
>
01.15.13 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 4:24:50 PM
Creation date
1/16/2013 2:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION <br />OWNER CITY jr SAN MARCOS, TEXAS PROJECT NO. <br />PROJECT Comanche 24" WTM <br />CONTRACTOR Santa Clara Construction <br />ARCHITECT KBR Technical Services, Inc. <br />OWNER <br />CONTRACTOR <br />ARCHITECT <br />RFI NO. 13 (Thirteen) <br />REFERENCE DATA: <br />SPECIFICATION SECTION NO. PAGE NO. PARA. NO. <br />SHEET NO. 45 <br />DETAIL DESIGNATION <br />ENTITLED 24" WTM / 8" Existing WWL Conflict Sta 50 +78 to 53 +50 <br />DRAWING ATTACHED (YES /NO) <br />❑ INFORMATION, ❑ INTERPRETATION, ® CLARIFICATION IS REQUESTED FOR THE ITEMS <br />DESCRIBED BELOW OR IN ATTACHED MATERIALS REFERENCED BELOW <br />In potholing for the proposed 24" WTM we discovered the WW main to follow a different assignment than <br />indicated on Sheet 45. At Sta 50 +78.28 where the existing WWMH is located, the 24" proposed line is <br />off of the existing WW by +/- 10' and inside the existing WL by +/- 6'. However when potholing at Sta 51 +40, <br />the existing WWL was found to be 4.5' off of the proposed 24" WL, and at Sta 52 +40 the 24" WL was found to <br />be 5.5' outside of the existing WWL (see attached pdf). A proposed assignment is indicated on the attached <br />for the indicated Stations, however further potholing may be needed to determine the best place to tie back into <br />the proposed assignment. <br />REQUESTED BY: Tim Unger DATE: 10/10/12 <br />❑ INFORMATION, ❑ INTERPRETATION, ❑ CLARIFICATION IS REQUESTED FOR THE ITEMS <br />DESCRIBED ABOVE OR IN ATTACHED MATERIALS REFERENCED ABOVE <br />Please proceed with suggested field change as illustrated in attached sketch and with attention to Utility Note <br />#7 on Sheet 3 of project plans. <br />RESPONSE BY: Ramon Salazar, P.E. DATE: 10/11/12 <br />Y:\Water—Resources\SNM—ATW2—COMANCHE\Construction\RFIs\RFI No. 13.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.