Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 12~Þd <br /> City of San Marcos, Texas <br /> Exhibit 6 <br /> Notes to General Purpose Financial Statements <br /> September 30, 1992 <br /> 1. Significant Áccounting Policies <br /> Background <br /> The City of San Marcos, Texas (the City) was incorporated July 11, 1877, while the <br /> City's Home Rule Charter was adopted by election in 1967. The City operates under a <br /> Council-Manager-Mayor form of government and provides the following services as <br /> authorized by its charter: public safety (police apd fIre), highways and streets, sanitation, <br /> health and social services, culture-recreation, public improvements, planning and zoning, <br /> general and administrative, electric, water, and wastewater services. <br /> The accounting and reporting policies of the City relating to the funds and account groups <br /> included in the accompanying general purpose financial statements conform to generally <br /> accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to state and local governments. <br /> Generally accepted accounting principles for local governments inc1ude those principles <br /> prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following <br /> represent the significant accounting and reporting policies and practices used by the City. <br /> The Reporting Entity <br /> In evaluating how to define the government for financial reporting purposes, management <br /> has considered all potential component units. The decision to include a potential <br /> component unit in the reporting entity was made by applying the criteria set forth in <br /> GAAP. The basic, but not the only, criterion, for including a potential component unit <br /> within the reponing entity is the governing body's ability to exercise oversight <br /> responsibility. The most significant manifestation of this ability is financial <br /> interdependency. Other manifestations of the ability to exercise oversight responsibility <br /> include, but are not limited to, the selection of governing authority, the designation of <br /> management, the ability to significantly influence operations, and accountability for fiscal <br /> matters. A second criterion used in evaluating potential component units is the scope of <br /> public service. Application of this criterion involves considering whether the activity <br /> benefits the government and/or its citizens, or whether the activity is conducted within <br /> the geographic boundaries of the government and is generally available to its citizens. A <br /> third criterion used to evaluate potential component units for inclusion or exclusion from <br /> the reporting. entity is the existence of special financing relationships, regardless of <br /> , whether the government is able to exercise oversight responsibilities. Based upon the <br /> -12- <br />