Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ) 2. ~D¡J <br /> City of San Marcos, Texas <br /> Exhibit 6 <br /> Notes to General Purpose Financial Statements (continued) <br /> September 30, 1992 <br /> 4. Retirement Plan (continued) <br /> amounting to $471,394 (4.70% of covered payroll for the months in calendar year 1991, <br /> 3.66% normal cost plus 1.04% to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability, and 6.21 % for <br /> the months in calendar year 1992, 5.08% normal cost plus 1.13% to amortize the <br /> unfunded actuarial liability) for the City and $405,380 (5%) for the employees. The City <br /> adopted changes in the plan subsequent to the previous actuarial valuaÖon, which had the <br /> effect of increasing the City's contribution rate for 1992 by 1.46% of payroll. There: were <br /> no related party transactions. <br /> Funding Status and Progress <br /> Even though the substance of the City's plan is not to provide a defined benefit in some <br /> fonn, some additional voluntary disclosure is appropriate due to the nontradirionalnature <br /> .. <br /> of the defined contribution plan which had an initial unfunded pension benefit obligation <br /> due to the monetary credits granted by the City for services rendered before the plan <br /> began and which can have additions to the unfunded pension benefit obligation through <br /> the periodic adoption of increases in benefit credits and benefits. Statement No.5 of the <br /> Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB 5) defines pension benefit obligation <br /> as a standardized disclosure measure of the actuarial present value of pension benefits, <br /> adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases, estimated to be payable in the future <br /> as a result of employee service to date. The measure is intended to help users assess the <br /> funding status of public employee pension plans, assess progress made in accumulating <br /> sufficient assets to pay benefits when due,' and make comparisons among public <br /> employee pension plans. <br /> The pension benefit obligation shown below is similar in nature to the standardized <br /> disclosure measure required by GASB 5 for defined benefit plans except that there is no <br /> need to project salary increases since the benefit credits earned for service to date are not <br /> dependent upon future salaries. The calculations were made as part of the annual <br /> actuarial valuation as of December 31, 1991. Because of the money-purchase nature of <br /> the plan, the interest rate assumption, currently 8.5% per year, does not have as much <br /> impact on the results as it does for a defined benefit plan. Market value of assets is not <br /> determined for each city's plan, but the market value of assets for ThfRS as a whole was <br /> 114.1 % of book value as of December 31, 1991. <br /> -24- <br />