My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01241983 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1983
>
01241983 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2007 9:28:33 AM
Creation date
12/2/2003 4:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/24/1983
Volume Book
60
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> llO <br /> Regular Meeting January 24, 1983 Page 3 <br /> Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration the adoption of a Resolu- <br /> tion, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO STOKES <br /> CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, FOR <br /> GENERAL CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THE ADDITION OF FIRE <br /> STATION #3 LOCATED AT BUGG LANE AND HOUSTON ROAD <br /> IN SAID CITY; ACCEPTING SAID ADDITION FOR USE BY <br /> SAID CITY; AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT <br /> OF $1,813.32 AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> Mr. Farr moved for the adoption of the Resolution and Mrs. Norris <br /> seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> The Council then received a report of the 1982 Charter Review Commis- <br /> Slone Dr. Betty Kissler advised the Council the report brought the <br /> Charter up to date with state law and they cleaned up the Charter by <br /> removing provisions that were no longer necessary. Then she reviewed <br /> with the Council new items recommended by the Commission. A copy of <br /> the Commission's report lS attached to these minutes. City Attorney <br /> Barbara Edwards advised the Council the recommendations could not be <br /> considered by the electors prior to August, 1983. Mayor Craddock <br /> directed the City Secretary publish the report. <br /> Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of the re coTtunen- <br /> dations of the Ethics Review Commission. Brenda Smith of the Ethics <br /> Review Commission advised the only major change recommended dealt with <br /> the candidates runnlng for Mayor or Councilmernbers, that they file a <br /> sworn statement with the City Secretary. Mr. Farr moved for approval <br /> of the recommendation and Mrs. Norris seconded the motion, which <br /> passed unanimously. The other two minor recommendations of the <br /> Commission dealt with the retention of statements and inspection <br /> and the forms for statements. Mrs. Norris moved to approve the re- <br /> commendations and Mr. Brown seconded the motion, which passed unani- <br /> mously. City Attorney Barbara Edwards was directed to amend the <br /> Ethics Ordinance to reflect these recommendations and bring it to <br /> the Council for approval. <br /> The Mayor stated the Council would receive a recommendation from the <br /> three wrecker companies on rotation with the City of San Marcos for <br /> rate adjustments. PeeWee Dougherty stated the wrecker companies under <br /> the rotation system had not had a rate increase since the adoption of <br /> the Ordinance in 1977 in the rates of towing, dollies and storage. <br /> Mrs. Norris requested the Staff investigate the recommendation and <br /> determine if the rate requests would be fair and reasonable. The <br /> City Attorney advised she would place the recommendations in Ordin- <br /> ance form for the Council's approval when it comes back to the Council. <br /> Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of changes of <br /> the pay and manning schedule for the Police and Fire Departments. <br /> Police Chief Galchutt addressed the Council stating there were two <br /> proposals before them for the Police Department. The first proposal <br /> would change the positions of lieutenant and captain to two lieutenants. <br /> This would bring more unity of command and would make for better man- <br /> agement structure in the police department. The second proposal was a <br /> reclassification of the existing detectives and police officers, which <br /> would allow for more advancement. "It allows for lateral movement be- <br /> tween police investigation unit and police patrol without making this <br /> a disciplinary action or some other type of action that could cause some <br /> personnel problems. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.