Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> first in four of the eight categories. residents in the <br /> central and east section of the city ranked lowest in <br /> recycling efforts. In seven of the eight categories, students <br /> display a higher propensity to recycle than residents. In <br /> regard to residential location there appear to be few <br /> significant differences. In regard to race, it is clear that <br /> anglos are more positive about recycling than either <br /> Hispanics or African Americans. <br /> [See Tables 16a and 1Gb] <br /> As we might expect, respondents are also supportive of <br /> recycling programs as reflected in Table 17. There is strong <br /> support for mandatory recycling efforts and for monetary <br /> benefits to those implementing recycling programs. There are <br /> little differences between residents and students on the <br /> issues of mandatory recycling an~ monetary benefits, as noted <br /> in Table 17a, but considerable differences on the question <br /> relating to chipper-machine service. (Students, obviously, <br /> have less need for this type of service than residents.) In <br /> regard to residential location and race, there are only minor <br /> differences. <br /> Concerning costs, most respondents say they are <br /> willing to pay $5.00 or less per month, but almost 15 percent <br /> were willing to pay as much as $10 per month. <br /> 57 <br />