My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1990-047
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1990 s
>
1990
>
Res 1990-047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 1:21:03 PM
Creation date
7/23/2007 1:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
1990-47
Date
5/14/1990
Volume Book
98
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 11 <br />10 million gallons per day (MGD) and the increase in flow is <br />estimated to be 1.0 MGD at the end of the year 2000, then only <br />ten percent of the estimated cost of construction would be <br />included in the impact fee calculation. <br />A tabulation of the maximum number of Service Units that could be <br />expected for the various land use categories was prepared by the <br />Public Works Department (see page 12). This tabulation, when <br />compared to the projected population increase, revealed that an <br />increase in service demand of approximately forty percent could <br />be expected by the end of the ten year period. <br />The closer a particular project comes toward actually being <br />built, the more accurate the cost of the project can be <br />projected. Factors which affect construction costs include <br />current market forces, terrain, soil/rock conditions, size of the <br />project and the availability of land" Several projects listed in <br />both the water and wastewater utility plans are relatively far <br />along in the process of design and, therefore, provides more <br />accurate projections of construction cost than others. <br />An evaluation of the costs associated with upgrading the <br />treatment level of the wastewater treatment plant was included in <br />the Wastewater System Master Plan. It would be unreasonable to <br />assume that the permit renewal for the plant will not require a <br />treatment level of at least 10/15 instead of the current 20/20. <br />While the projected costs for the plant expansion reflect the <br />anticipated higher level of treatment, it does not include costs <br />for nutrient removal. Should the permit renewal require such <br />additional treatment, the impact fee calculations should be <br />revised to reflect a higher construction cost. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.