My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord 2013-035/Amending Chapters 1 through 8 of the Land Development Code to implement the changes made through Ord 2013-16 which adopted the comprehensive plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
02 Ordinances
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Ord 2013-035/Amending Chapters 1 through 8 of the Land Development Code to implement the changes made through Ord 2013-16 which adopted the comprehensive plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2013 1:57:08 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 8:34:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Ordinances
City Clerk - Type
Amending
Number
2013-35
Date
8/6/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Subpart B - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE <br />Chapter 1 - DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES <br />ARTICLE 10: - RELIEF PROCEDURES <br />DIVISION 4: - VESTED RIGHTS PETITION <br />predecessor zoning, subdivision or development ordinance, shall expire on the effective date of this Land <br />Development Code. <br />(c) The owner of the land subject to an initial permit that expires under subsection (b) may petition the City Council to <br />reinstate such zoning permit by filing a written petition within 60 calendar days of the effective date of this Land <br />Development Code. The petition shall clearly state the grounds for reinstatement, and shall be accompanied by <br />documentation of one of the following: <br />(1) As of May 11, 2000, one of the following events had occurred: <br />a. A final permit for all or part of the land subject to the approved initial permit was approved, or was filed and <br />was subsequently approved; <br />b. An application for a final permit was submitted for all or part of the land subject to the expired initial permit, <br />but such application was rejected on grounds of incompleteness; <br />c. Costs for development of the land subject to the initial permit, including but not limited to costs associated <br />with roadway, utility and other infrastructure facilities designed to serve the land in whole or in part, but <br />exclusive of land acquisition costs, were incurred in the aggregate amount of five percent of the most <br />recent appraised market value of the land; <br />d. Fiscal security was posted to ensure performance of an obligation required for all or a part of the land <br />subject to the approved initial permit; or <br />e. Utility connection fees or impact fees for all or part of the land subject to the approved initial permit were <br />paid. <br />(2) After May 11, 2000 but before the expiration date specified in subsection (b), one of the following events had <br />occurred: <br />A final permit was approved for all or part of the land subject to the approved zoning permit, and remained <br />in effect for such land on such expiration date; or <br />A complete application for approval of a final permit for all or part of the land subject to the approved initial <br />permit was pending for decision on such expiration date. <br />(d) The City Council may take one of the following actions: <br />(1) Reinstate the expired initial permit without an expiration date, if it finds that the petitioner has met any one of the <br />criteria listed in subsection (c)(1); <br />(2) Reinstate the initial permit for all or part of the land subject thereto, if it finds that the petitioner has met any one <br />of the criteria listed in subsection (c)(2), subject to such expiration dates or other conditions that assure that the <br />remaining land that is not subject to an approved or pending final permit application will be developed in a timely <br />fashion. In granting relief under this provision, the Council may require that development of such remaining land <br />is subject to standards enacted after approval of the initial permit; <br />(3) Deny the petition, if it finds that the petitioner has failed to meet any of the criteria in subsection (c); or <br />(4) Reinstate the zoning permit for only that part of the land subject to a pending final permit application, if it finds <br />that the petitioner has met the criteria in subsection (c)(2)(b) and the pending application subsequently was <br />approved, and deny the petition for the remaining land subject to the expired initial permit. <br />San Marcos, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 138 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.