Laserfiche WebLink
Subpart B <br />- LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE <br />Chapter 1 - <br />DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES <br />ARTICLE 1: - <br />DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS <br />DIVISION 2: - SEQUENCE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS <br />(1) An application for approval of a Watershed Protection Plan (Phase 1 or Phase 2 as applicable, refer to Section <br />1.7.1.2) shall be decided prior to any application for Subdivision Concept Plat, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat or <br />a Preliminary Development Plat. <br />(2) An application for approval of a Subdivision Concept Plat shall be decided before any application for approval of <br />a Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Preliminary Development Plat or related final plat. <br />(3) An application for a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustments concerning lot size, lot dimensions or other <br />standards affecting platting shall be decided prior to any application for approval of a Preliminary Subdivision <br />Plat or Preliminary Development Plat. <br />(e) Administrative Priority. The following priorities are established among administrative applications for the same land: <br />(1) An application for a Site Preparation Permit shall be decided prior to any decision of a construction permit. <br />(2) An application for approval of a Final Subdivision Plat or Final Development Plat shall be decided prior to <br />approval of an application for a construction permit. <br />(3) An application for a building permit shall be decided prior to approval of an application for a certificate of <br />occupancy. <br />Section 1 „1...2...3 ,,. Subsequent Pirlioirlity Alplpllliii atiiioin Inconsistency wiiitlh Subordinate AppIllicatiloin <br />When a development application is submitted that is assigned priority over one or more approved development <br />applications that remain in effect, and there is a conflict or inconsistency between the priority application and the approved <br />subordinate applications, the applicant for the priority application shall submit with the application an unconditional written <br />statement acknowledging that, upon approval of the priority application, all approvals of inconsistent subordinate <br />applications shall be vacated, and the applicant will be required to resubmit the subordinate applications for amendment <br />consistent with the approved priority application. Failure to submit this statement shall result in denial of the priority <br />application. If the inconsistency between the priority application and the subordinate application is not discovered until <br />after the priority application is approved, the inconsistency shall constitute grounds for revocation of approval of the <br />priority application upon discovery. <br />San Marcos, Texas, Code of Ordinances Page 5 <br />