Laserfiche WebLink
City of San Marcos - Drainage Master Plan <br />Halff Associates Study Type Categories <br />Type / Name Available Information outside DMP Scope Proposed DMP Scope <br />Type A Streams - GBRA <br />Survey: <br />Survey will be performed under the GBRA scope to meet or exceed FEhLA <br />requirements. <br />No additional effort. <br />Field Reconnaissance: <br />Field photos of each structure will be performed under the GBRA scope to <br />meet or exceed FE \dA requirements. <br />No additional effort. <br />Hydrology: <br />Hydrologic analysis will be performed under the GBRA scope using <br />Sn dens UH approach. <br />No additional effort. <br />Hydraulic analysis will be performed under the GBRA scope using limited <br />detail and detailed methodologies. Most study designations match FEMA <br />Hydraulics: <br />designations and are therefore FFMA compliant. There are 3 exceptions <br />that may not be FENiA compliant and may require additional survey and <br />hydraulic modeling. n%illow Springs Creek (1.54 mi), Purgatory Creek (7.53 <br />nhi), and Sink Creek (4.3 mi ) <br />No additional effort. <br />Frequency Events: <br />Existing and 20 -yr Future Conditions <br />2 -, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50,100, 250-, 500- •r events <br />No additional effort. <br />Floodplain Mapping: <br />Existing Condition 10- and 25 -year events <br />Existin Condition 100- ear only <br />and 20- •r Future Conditions 10-, 25-, and 100-year events <br />Floodplain Mitigation Analysis: <br />Stream regional flood control alternatives. <br />No additional effort. <br />Conceptual Concepts: <br />Each proposed floodplain mitigation alternative will include a conceptual <br />plan. <br />Minimal effort to match San Marcos DMP standards. (7 Projects) <br />Benefit Cost Estimations: <br />Each Proposed floodplain mitigation alternative will include a basic cost <br />estimation. <br />\Minimal effort to match San Marcos DMP standards. (5 Projects) <br />Structure Inventory and <br />Inventory structure information that list the frequency and depth of <br />'Mitigation Ranking <br />overtopping and ADT if available. A ranking of priorities is based on this <br />information. <br />No additional effort. <br />Report: <br />Tl1•DB Flood Protection Planning Report that outlines all tasks above. <br />No additional effort. <br />Type B Streams - 2007 FPP <br />Survey: <br />No new surveys will be necessary as long as structures have not been <br />Surveyed in 2005 <br />improved since date of last survey. <br />Field Reconnaissance: <br />No new surveys will be necessary as long as structures have not been <br />Field photos of each structure were performed in 2005 <br />improved since date of last survey. <br />Hydrologic update would utilize GBRA hydrologic analysis on majority of <br />Hydrology: <br />streams with die exception of Cottonwood Creek. Cottonwood Creek is <br />outside the scope of the GBRA study and therefore will require new <br />Hydrologic analysis was performed in 2007 using NRCS UH approach. <br />h drolo& analysis. <br />Update of existing hydraulic models. 2007 geospatial XS will be re -cut on <br />Hydraulics: <br />the new 2006 -2009 LiDAR. Coded structures will not be revised unless <br />necessary. New GBRA and Cottonwood Creek flow rates will also be <br />Hydraulic analysis was performed in 3007 using 2003 LiDAR supplemented <br />incorporated into the HEC -R\S models. Minor model adjustments may be <br />with <br />necessa • with the addition of new topo a by and flow rates. <br />Frequency Events: <br />Existing and 20 -yr Future Conditions <br />Existing and 20 -yr Future Conditions (From GBRA study) <br />2-,10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -yc events <br />2 -, 5 -, 10-, 25-, 50-,100-, 250-, 500 - r events <br />Floodplain \Lapping: <br />Existing Condition and 20 -yr Future Conditions <br />Existing and Ultimate Condition 100 -year <br />10-, 25-, and 100 -year events <br />Update ofexisting floodplain mitigation analysis using new hydraulic <br />Floodplain 'Mitigation Analysis: <br />models. This will just be a validation that the 2007 mitigation alternative is <br />Floodplain miti ation analysis was performed in 2007. <br />valid with the updated hydraulic model. (8 projects) <br />Conceptual Concepts: <br />Update conceptual concepts using new hydraulic models. This effort will <br />Limited conceptual concepts were performed in 2007. <br />include slight revisions to the 2007 conce tual alternatives. (4 projects) <br />Benefit Cost Estimations: <br />Update benefit cost using new hydraulic models. This effort will include <br />Limited cost estimations were performed in 2007. <br />slight recisions to the 2007 costs.(4 projects) <br />Structure Inventory and <br />Inventory structure information that list the frequency and depth of <br />Mitigation Ranking <br />overtopping and ADT if available. A ranking of priorities is based on this <br />This was not part of die 2007 study. <br />information. <br />Report: <br />A report for the 2007 study was prepared in 2007. <br />Fronde an amendment document for the 2007 report. <br />Type C Streams - FENIA <br />Survey: <br />None <br />4 structures, 3 SS <br />Field Reconnaissance: <br />done <br />4 Zone AE structures and 1 Zone A structure <br />Hydrology: <br />Hydrologic analysis will be performed under the GBRA scope using <br />Snyder's UH approach. <br />No additional effort. <br />Hydraulics: <br />:lone <br />Detailed: PC -1 & Willow Springs Creek; Limited Detail: LINT to PC <br />Frequency Events: <br />Existing and 20 -yr Future Conditions <br />2-,5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 250-, 500 -yr events <br />No additional effort. <br />Floodpla n [app tag <br />Existing Condition and 20 -yr Future Conditions <br />None <br />10-, 25-, and 100 -year events <br />Floodplain 'Mitigation Analysis: <br />.lone <br />Stream flood control alternatives. (3 projects) <br />Conceptual Concepts: <br />Each proposed floodplain mitigation alternative will include a conceptual <br />None <br />plan. (1 Project) <br />Benefit Cost Estimations: <br />Each proposed floodplain mitigation alternative will include a basic cost <br />None <br />estimation. (I Project) <br />Structure Inventory and <br />Inventory <br />structure information that list the frequency and depth of <br />Mitigation Ranking <br />- <br />overtopping and ADT if available. A ranking of priorities is based on this <br />None information. <br />Report: <br />None <br />Provide a report detailing methodologies and results. <br />Now In order to submit this infinnariun to FE-MA for a ntap updtte, addiyoaml work is necessary. Additional tasks may include additional surmy and hydraulic modeling along <br />identified Type A'- GBRA streams, generation of base flood elevations, delineation of the 500 -year floodptuns, floods ay analysts or ordinance adoption of freiloency event for flooduray <br />regulation, generation of FE\LA profiles and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) information, and generation of necessary Fr—\L1 fomts and documentation for a letter o0lap Change. <br />