Laserfiche WebLink
<br />79 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting February 27, 1984 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />the reasonable charge to be paid up front with a refund at the end <br />of the 3-year period, if overpaid. City Manager Gonzalez stated he <br />thought all the LUE charges were reasonable, with the exception of <br />restaurants, which was not in line yet. Director of Public Works <br />Boeker said they were getting concrete information on restaurants <br />and would make a presentation to the Council within four to six weeks. <br />City Attorney Hankins stated the reason why a presentation was being <br />made is because there was no provision in our Ordinance for a refund <br />to be made if an appeal to the Council were denied and he felt an adjust- <br />ment needed to be made. Mayor Craddock directed Mr. Hankins make such <br />adjustment in the Ordinance to take care of this type situation. Mr. <br />Hankins stated the restaurant definition was broad and he would work <br />on defining different types of restaurants. Mr. Gonzalez stated while <br />the Ordinance is being amended, he wanted a provision wherein the fee <br />would be reviewed on an annual basis. Mr. Gonzalez advised the repre- <br />sentatives of Carl's Jr. Restaurants they might consider paying the <br />LUE charge of a restaurant operating 12 or less hours and receive their <br />permit, and could amend their request later if the Council amends the <br />Ordinance to a more acceptable LUE charge for 24 hour restaurants. <br /> <br />t1r. Guerra moved the Council adjourn into Executive Session pursuant <br />to Article 6252-17, §2(e) and §2(g), V.A.C.S., to discuss personnel, <br />contemplated litigation and pending litigation and matters where the <br />duty of a public body's counsel to his client pursuant to the Code of <br />Professional Responsibility clearly conflicts with this Article (pend- <br />ing litigation - Kyle vs. City), and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion, <br />which passed unanimously (9:40 p.m.). <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved the Council convene at 10:32 p.m. and Mr. Brown se- <br />conded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced a discussion regarding the legality of the <br />city Council Workshop held February 7, 1984 at Aquarena Springs Restaur- <br />ant. City Attorney Hankins reviewed with the Council a memorandum from <br />him addressed to the Council dated February 23, 1984, a copy of which <br />is attached to these minutes. Mr. Bill Coddington submitted a memoran- <br />dum to the Council, which he read into the record. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of $1,000.00 from <br />contingency funds for the Corridor Council. Mr. Kreczmer moved for <br />approval of the funds and Mayor Craddock seconded the motion, which <br />passed unanimously. After this first year of funding from the govern- <br />mental entities along the Corridor, the Corridor Council is to obtain <br />funding as follows: 75% from the private sector and 25% from the <br />governmental entities along the Corridor. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 11:01 p.m. on motion made by Mr. Brown and <br />seconded by Mr. Moore. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />rJ <br /> <br />Karl W. Brown <br />Council Member <br /> <br />~JC~ <br /> <br />Fred Guerra <br />Council Member <br />