Laserfiche WebLink
<br />39 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, DECEMBER 21, 1984. <br /> <br /> <br />PRESENT: Mayor Emmie Craddock <br />Council Members Karl W. Brown <br />Bill Coddington <br />Gerald G. Farr <br />* Fred Guerra <br />Betty Jane Kissler <br />* Jaime Moore <br /> <br />City Manager A. C. Gonzalez <br />City Secretary * Janis K. Womack <br />City Attorney Lamar Hankins <br />Director of Planning Frank Robbins <br /> <br />Also present: Caroline Chapman, Gregg Echols, Roland Richter, Ruben <br />James, Charles Chapman, Jerri Martin, Robert McDonald, Terry Ewald, <br />Ross Allegro, Jerry Klossner, and others. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration authorization for the City <br />Attorney to take legal action to protect the City's interest in regard <br />to the Woods of McCarty Lane Subdivision Plat. City Manager began by <br />stating there was confusion of the process in which the action that the <br />Planning Commission took concerning the Woods of McCarty Lane Subdivision <br />Plat. Director of Planning Frank Robbins then took the podium. He stated <br />that the Planning Commission lacked two important components when they <br />reviewed the plat on November 27, 1984 which were: the Planning Com- <br />mission did not know that the agency, Edwards Underground Water District, <br />had indicated that the entire subdivision instead of only a portion of i~ <br />was over the out-crop of the Edwards and Associated Limest-one" and <br />secondly, the signed plat by the Health Department Authoritarian, Terry <br />Ewald, indicating that the water company for that subdivision was an <br />approved water company, which in fact the approved water supply company <br />was not approved company of the State of Texas. Mr. Robbins also noted <br />that the security for improvements had not been provided when the plat <br />was approved. Mayor Craddock asked Mr. Robbins what could be done in the <br />future to avoid this, and Mr. Robbins replied that a re-write of the <br />subdivision regulations would be necessary. Mr. Farr asked why there were <br />no percolation tests done. Mr. Terry Ewald stated that the tests were <br />not done because the plat was submitted before the tests were necessary. <br />He further stated that the tests were done when the plat was finally ap- <br />proved, not submitted. City Attorney Hankins stated that if the Council <br />wished to go into executive session to discuss items they felt were not <br />to be discussed publically, then they should do so. He further stated <br />there were two possible legal actions he was requesting approval for, <br />which were: <br />1) permission to file a motion to intervene and a motion for re-hearing <br />in that lawsuit that was filed by R. W. McDonald Development Corpora- <br />tion against the County Commissioner and County Judge. <br /> <br />2) File an action for a temporary restraining ,order and injunction be- <br />cause of the site development work that has been ongoing on that <br />site for at least two weeks. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hankins would like the appeal to be heard as soon as pos- <br />sible, preferably at the next City Council's Regular Meeting (Jan. 14, 198: <br />A public hearing would be also scheduled. <br />Ms. Kissler moved to approve authorization for City Attorney to take legal <br />action to protect the City's interest in regard to the Woods of McCarty <br />Lane Subdivision Plat and Mr. Coddington seconded the motion. Mr. Jerry <br />Klossner approached the podium and stated that he had a problem with Mr. <br />Hankins possible legal actions and stated that the City would need to dis- <br />cuss liability. <br /> <br />*Messrs. Guerra and Moore and~. Womack were not present. <br />