My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01281981 Special Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1981
>
01281981 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2004 3:20:40 PM
Creation date
12/5/2003 3:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Special Meeting
Date
1/28/1981
Volume Book
55
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
71 <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, JANUARY 28, 1981 <br /> <br />PRESENT: Mayor <br /> <br />Kenneth V Kraus <br /> <br />Council Members <br /> <br />Karl W. Brown <br />Robert L. Cavazos <br />Berry R. James <br />Tess Norris <br />John J. Stokes <br />Ed Tarbutton <br /> <br />City Manager <br />City Secretary <br />City Attorney <br /> <br />A. C. Gonzalez <br />Sharyl Werner <br />Barbara Edwards <br /> <br />Also Present: Scott Yarbrough, Bob Barton, Dr. Stouffer, Melissa <br />Millecam, Jerri Martin, Frank Wagner, Jeff Watkins, Ruben Ruiz, <br />Cindy Rippley, Mr. & Mrs. Pryatel, Dan Farlow, Ralph Gonzales, Nelvia <br />Burleson, Chris Banberry and others. <br /> <br />The Mayor called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. <br /> <br />The Mayor introduced for consideration reconsideration of the Charter <br />Review Commission report, namely the question of Single Member Districts. <br />Mr. Cavazos addressed the Council first and stated his reasons for <br />being for Single Member Districts. Mr. Stokes stated that the Charter <br />Review Commission did not make a specific recommendation for this to be <br />placed on the ballot. He said that with the NAACP filing a protest, it <br />would delay the Justice Departments decision and more than likely keep <br />it off the ballot for this year. Mr. Tarbutton stated that he felt this <br />issue should not be placed on the ballot for two or three years. Mr. Stokes <br />then moved to place on the ballot eleciton of Council Members in six <br />Single Member Districts and the Mayor at large, if the reply was received <br />from the Justice Department in time. Mr. Cavazos seconded the motion. Mr. <br />Brown stated that he was more in favor of a 5-1-1 system, that it would be <br />more fair to the blacks, less expensive to run for office, has more support <br />from the people and would probably be looked on more favorably by the <br />Justice Department. Mr. Stokes asked the City Attorney if the decision <br />was delayed by the Justice Department if this could be placed on the ballot <br />in 1982. The City Attorney stated no because other charter revisions were <br />being considered on the ballot this time, so it would have to wait until <br />1983. The Mayor then let interested persons address the Council on this itel <br />Ruben Ruiz stated that he was against Single Member Districts and that the <br />chances of the City being sues increases. Nelvia Burleson stated that the <br />black community was against redistricting and that they would file an <br />injunction with the Justice Department if the Council passed this motion. <br />Chris Banberry also stated that the black community would file against this <br />proposal. Augustin Lucio said that the people of the community should be <br />the ones to make the choice. Mr. Pryatel asked about the 4-2-1 system not <br />being discussed at this meeting. It was stated that since it had failed <br />the other night, it would more than likely fail again if it was voted on. <br />Bob Barton stated that the high cost of running in at large elections was <br />the best reason for Single Member Districts. He said he did not feel that <br />it was necessarily true that the 6-1 system would be turned down by the <br />Justice Department. Mr. Stokes then amended his motion to state that <br />provided a reply was received from the Justice Department by March 6, 1981, <br />the issue would be placed on the ballot. Mr. Cavazos agreed to the amend- <br />ment. On roll call, the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, Cavazos, James, Kraus, Stokes <br /> <br />NAY: Norris, Tarbutton <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. on motion of Mr. Cavazos and second of <br />Mr. Brown. <br /> <br /> [Kenneth V Kraus <br /> ! ayor <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.