Laserfiche WebLink
<br />74 <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, MARCH 4, 1982 <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />Emmie Craddock <br /> <br />Council Members <br /> <br />Karl W. Brown <br />Robert L. Cavazos <br />Berry R. James <br />John A. Kreczmer <br />Elida A. Mendez <br />Tess Norris <br /> <br />City Manager <br />City Secretary <br />City Attorney <br />City Planner <br /> <br />A. C. Gonzalez <br />Janis K. Womack <br />Barbara Edwards <br />Joe Garza <br /> <br />Also Present: Jeff Watkins, Chester Witte, Gerald Farr, Jane Wilson, <br />Billy Moore, Joyce Glore, Harvey Ginsburg, Aart Millecam, Dr. Ken Long, <br />Julie (KCNY) , John Stokes, David Morrison, Jaime Moore, Anna Farr, <br />Frances Stovall and others. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock advised the Council would receive a report from the Hill- <br />side and Landscaping Ordinances Negotiating Committee that was formed <br />to resolve the conflicts on the proposed environmental controls. Re- <br />presenting the developers in the Committee were John Stokes, Bill Howle <br />and Chester Witte. Representing P&Z and the Environmental Ordinance <br />Development Committee were Gerald Farr, Mrs. Joyce Glore, Billy Moore <br />and Aart Millecam, substituting in place of Mrs. Glore in some of the <br />meetings. Gerald Farr served as Chairman of the Committee. Messrs. <br />Farr and Stokes advised the Committee was in concurrence on the two <br />Ordinances as revised by the Committee. Mr. Stokes felt the Ordinance <br />was something all of San Marcos could live with. The Committee came to <br />an agreement the intent of the Ordinance as the Council desired is to <br />control and regulate new developments in environmentally sensitive <br />areas in such a manner that the negative impact on the environment <br />and as affected by runoff and erosion after the completion of any <br />project is not greater than that prior to development, and this can <br />be accomplished by a combination of several things set up in the Ordin- <br />ance, such as structures (berms), retardation, attenuation controls, <br />planting areas for filtration, swales, etc. The intent of the Ordin- <br />ance is to solve the problem on the site. The Committee thought a more <br />appropriate name for the Hillside Ordinance would be the Interim Drainage <br />and Erosion Control Ordinance. Because of the cost of enforcing the <br />Ordinance, the Committee felt the need to eliminate R-l and R-2 zoning <br />from the Ordinance. New subdivisions would come under the Ordinance. <br />Any slope of 15% automatically is covered by the Ordinance and areas <br />of less than 2 acres would be excluded. <br /> <br />Some of the changes in the Landscaping Ordinance are as follows: Page <br />7 - Land Use - the requirement of industrial landscaping - 20% is re- <br />duced to 10%; Page 3 - definition of Buffer - "according to conditions <br />on site". Parking lots were included as construction; Page 17 - Para- <br />graph (5) - (one of the penalties by the Director of Public Works) - <br />added "most advantageous time for planting within 12 months"; Pages 8 <br />and 9 - Credit for Trees - if grass or other vegetation is planted under <br />the one-half portion of diameter under tree, they are given extra cred- <br />it. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 5:16 p.m. on motion of Mr. Brown and seconded <br />by Mr. James. <br />