Laserfiche WebLink
<br />15 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 1997- 1 R R <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, ENDORSING H.B. 348 TO PROMOTE PUBLIC <br />WELFARE, PROTECT PROPERTY VALUES, AND CURE THE <br />ELGIN BANK COURT RULING; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. . <br /> <br />Recitals: <br /> <br />1. Greater than ever before, in areas adjacent to San Marcos and across the <br />State, a significant degree of growth and new development is taking place outside of cities <br />under the primary jurisdiction of Texas counties. <br /> <br />2. Te:x?s counties have traditionally been empowered to review plats for the <br />creation of new subdivisions outside of cities, so as to insure that basic transportation and <br />public health requirements can be provided for. <br /> <br />3. The exercise of these powers by Texas counties is important to the orderly <br />and health growth of areas outside cities in a sustainable manner that protects the future <br />residents of the subdivision and the value of surrounding properties. . <br />< <br /> <br />4. The recent Elgin Bank court decision has created both opportunity and <br />incentive for certain developments to be created without adequate infrastructure, and <br />without proper platting and review. <br /> <br />5. Hays County has a history of such substandard developments, which have <br />posed a hardship on taxpayers, endangered public health, and in some cases undermined <br />surrounding property values. <br /> <br />6. Such ill-conceived or "fly by night'" developments may put legitimate, well- <br />planned and properly reviewed subdivisions at a competitive disadvantage, and also tend <br />to tarnish the image of the broader real estate and development industries in the public <br />mind. <br /> <br />7. Unplatted and/or poor quality developments, without adequate provision <br />made for the health and safety of subdivision residents or existing adjacent landowners, <br />may be inadvertently "encouraged" under the Elgin Bank ruling, making it more difficult and <br />more costly for counties, school districts, municipalities, and emergency service districts <br />to deliver services safely and efficiently. <br /> <br />8. Substandard subdivision developments that counties are unable to control <br />will impede the future growth of the City and impose unreasonable burdens on City <br />taxpayers. <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS; <br /> <br />PART 1. That the City of San Marcos supports H.B. 348, pending in the 75th <br />Texas Legislature, to overturn the Elgin Bank decision and to conservatively and <br />appropriately strengthen county authority to regulate new subdivisions in order to insure <br />the adequate health, safety, and property values for residents and neighbors. <br /> <br />PART 2. That this Resolution is in full force and effect immediately from and after <br />its passage. <br /> <br />ADOPTED thislOtIday of February <br /> <br />,1997. <br />