My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1988-036
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1980 s
>
1988
>
Res 1988-036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2007 11:00:51 AM
Creation date
8/6/2007 11:00:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
1988-36
Date
3/7/1988
Volume Book
91
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6. <br /> <br />Develop a letter report summarizing the important issues <br />regarding rate design which have the most impact on the <br />City's purchased power costs. <br /> <br />Attend the remaining Rate Design Task Force meeting to <br />be scheduled in February in which the LCRA staff <br />proposal will be presented to the wholesale customers. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Analyze the preliminary impact of the proposed wholesale <br />rate on the purchased power bill of the City. <br /> <br />PHASE 2 - REVIEW OF LCRA RATE FILING AND IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL <br />ISSUES <br /> <br />After LCRA makes a rate filing, and upon the direction of the <br />City Manager of the City of San Marcos, A. C. Gonzalez, Saffer <br />Utility Consultants, Inc., will begin work in this phase. The <br />following tasks are to be performed for a maximum fee of Twenty-Five <br />Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00): <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Analyze the proposed wholesale rates and determine the <br />impact on City's purchased power costs. <br /> <br />Review rate filing to identify specific issues and <br />request additional information for quantification of the <br />potential value of these issues. Presently, these <br />issues would include the following: <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />d. <br /> <br />g. <br /> <br />h. <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />Analysis of the proposed loss factors used to <br />determine the respective transmission and <br />distribution rates. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Treatment of the $18 million payment of <br />Bluebonnet and Pedernales which was made from <br />the General Improvements Funds. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Treatment of the $27.5 million payment for the <br />Decker Settlement. <br /> <br />The timing of debt service <br />Fayette 3 and Cummings Creek. <br /> <br />payments <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />The impact on revenue requirements associated <br />with the Interruptible Rate. <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br />Scrutiny of Production, Transmission, <br />Distribution, Customer Accounting, and <br />Administrative and General expenses. <br /> <br />Scrutiny of the revenue requirement for Debt <br />Service Coverage. <br /> <br />Analysis of Working Capital requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.