My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06131984 Special Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1984
>
06131984 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2007 3:01:32 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 4:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Special Meeting
Date
6/13/1984
Volume Book
66
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />63 <br />Special Meeting June 13, 1984 Page 2 <br />Mr. Farr moved for adoption of the Ordinance and Mayor Craddock se- <br />conded the motion. Mr. Coddington moved to amend Section D.l.c. on <br />Page 1082 from "12 dwelling units per gross acre" to "9 dwelling <br />units per gross acre, " and Mr. Parr seconded the motion, which <br />passed unanimously. Mayor Craddock moved to amend Section 11.TH-l <br />D. Area Reqmts. - 7. on Page 1084, TH-2.D. Area Reqrnts. - 7. on Page <br />1084.1 and TH-3.D. Area Rèqmts. - 7. on Page 1084.2 from "maximum <br />building coverage as a percentage of lot area: 60%" to "maximum <br />building coverage as a percentage of lot area: 80%, " and Ms. Kissler <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Ms. Kissler then <br />moved to amend on the same pages in the same section numbered 4. <br />to change the "minimum depth of front setback: 25 feet" to "minimum <br />depth of front setback: 20 feet" (at the recommendation of Bill <br />Thomas). Mr. Guerra seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br />The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the Ordinance. <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration adoption of an Ordinance, <br />the caption which was read as follows: <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTIONS 1 (b), 1 (c), l(e), <br /> 1 (f), 2 (a) AND 2 (b) OF APPENDIX F, INTERIM DRAINAGE <br /> AND EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, OF THE CODE OF ORDIN- <br /> ANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS TO EXTEND THE <br /> APPLICATION OF SUCH ORDINANCE TO TERRITORY WITHIN THE <br /> EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF SAID CITY; AMENDING <br /> SECTIONS l(a), 1 (d) AND 1 (f) OF SAID ORDINANCE TO ADD <br /> A FINDING THAT SAID COUNCIL IS A TRUSTEE OF PORTIONS <br /> OF THE BLANCO RIVER AND TO ADD TO ITS OBJECTIVES THE <br /> PROTECTION OF PORTIONS OF THE BLANCO RIVER; AMENDING <br /> SECTIONS 2 (b), 2 (c) AND 2(e) OF SAID ORDINANCE TO DE- <br /> LETE THE EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAID ORDIN- <br /> ANCE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW STRUC- <br /> TURES ON PREVIOUSLY PLATTED LAND ZONED R-l, TH OR R-2; <br /> ADDING A PROVISION THAT ALL LAND TO BE DEVELOPED OR <br /> FURTHER DEVELOPED \'1ITHIN SAID CITY AND ITS EXTRATERRI- <br /> TORIAL JURISDICTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS <br /> OF SAID ORDINANCE; AMENDING SECTIONS 3(a) AND 9(c) BY <br /> CHANGING "THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS" AND "THE <br /> PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT" TO "THE CITY ENGINEER"; CLARI- <br /> FYING THE FEE REQUIREMENTS FOR REJECTED APPLICATIONS <br /> IN SECTION 14; AMENDING SECTION 15 OF SAID ORDINANCE <br /> TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF FINES FOR CONVICTIONS FOR <br /> VIOLATIONS OF SAID ORDINANCE, IN COMPLIANCE HITH STATE <br /> LAW; RE-NUMBERING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF SAID ORDINANCE; <br /> PROVIDING FOR THE PROMULGATION OF STANDARDS, REGULATIONS <br /> AND GUIDELINES BY THE CITY ENGINEER; SUBSTITUTING "CITY <br /> ENGINEER" FOR "DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS" WHEREVER THE <br /> LATTER PHRASE APPEARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br /> DATE. <br />Mayor Craddock moved for adoption of the Ordinance on third and <br />final reading and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion. Mr. Farr moved <br />to amend SECTION 13 of this Ordinance (which amends Section 14 of <br />Appendix F) on Page 5 to read as follows: "Any application for a <br />site development permit that is rejected by the City Engineer may <br />only be re-submitted as an original application and only after the <br />payment of the fee required to be paid for an original application, <br />providing that no application may be rejected unless it has been re- <br />viewed in its entirety and the applicant has had an opportunity to <br />respond to the City Engineer's complete review. Any time used to <br />respond to the City Engineer's review shall cause the time limits for <br />review to be extended a like amount of time." Ms. Kissler seconded <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.