Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IV. <br /> <br />COST ALLOCATION <br /> <br />The cost was derived for each water transmission line by multiplying the <br />length of line by the unit cost for that line. The unit costs were <br />obtained from similar projects recently bid in the area. Normal <br />excavaton through soil was assumed. The unit costs depend mostly on <br />the diameter of line and depth of placement. <br /> <br />The costs for constructing new lift stations was obtained by multiplying <br />the required flow at the lift stations in gpm times $140 per gpm. This <br />number was also obtained from recent projects bid in the area. The cost <br />for constructing upgrades to lift stations was obtained by multiplying the <br />required flow in gpm times $120 per gpm. This number was less than <br />the cost for new construction because utilities, site improvements, etc. <br />would not have to be constructed for the upgrade. <br /> <br />The cost for constructing a new V';'WTP was obtained by multiplying the <br />required flow in :\-IGD times $3,000,000 per MGD. This number was also <br />obtained from recent projects bid in the area. The cost for constructing <br />upgrades to an existing WWTP were obtained by multiplying the required <br />flow in MGD times $2,000,000 per MGD. The cost was less than the cost <br />for new construction because utilities, site improvements, etc. would not <br />have to be constructed for the upgrade. <br /> <br />The costs to construct the required wastewater collection and treatment <br />facilities were allocated for the three entities (City of San Marcos, <br />Lowman Ranch, and Cottonwood Creek Park) based upon a cost propor- <br />tional to the share of the capacity required by each entity. The <br />projected wastewater flow from each entity through each component was <br />divided by the total flow through that component to arrive at the <br />proportional share for each entity. This cost allocation was determined <br />for the selected wastewater system alternative evaluated for the <br />Cottonwood Creek service area. This was determined to be alternative <br />number 6 with a total construction cost of $ 12,624,329. <br /> <br />JONES Ii NEUSE <br /> <br />26 <br />