Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The following tables refer to the costs associated with the facilities of <br />the proposed alternative. Table 6 is a breakdown of the wastewater <br />interceptor line costs by phase and entity, and Table 7 is a breakdown <br />of the lift station and wastewater treatment costs by phase and entity. <br />Table 8 shows the total costs broken down by phase and entity. Table <br />9 shows the cost per living unit equivalent broken down by phase and <br />entity. Table 10 lists the percentage allocated to each entity for each <br />phase as well as the percentage allocated to each entity for the total <br />projected cost of the basin system. <br /> <br />The cost allocation for the three participating entities is based on <br />planning forecasts of probable needs for wastewater service. The costs <br />are considered preliminary and may need to be rev'ised as development <br />occurs and if portions of the Cottonwood Creek service area develop <br />differently thim projected. The entities participating in construction will <br />remain responsible for financing their proportionate share of the facilities <br />as development proceeds. <br /> <br />JONES ð NEUSE <br /> <br />27 <br />