My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1986-106
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1980 s
>
1986
>
Res 1986-106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Creation date
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
1986-106
Date
9/8/1986
Volume Book
82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />As a general statement, in order to assure the potential bondholder of <br />the security for revenue bonds, it is normal to assume that net <br />revenue will exceed required debt service by a specific coverage <br />factor which generally varies from 30 to 50 percent coverage. The <br />difference between net revenues and debt service can be accumulated <br />for future capital requirements or returned to the City against prior <br />investments of the City. <br /> <br />Revenue bonding capacities generally are based on a conservative <br />estimate of an airport's ability to generate net revenues. By <br />renegotiation of rates, fees, and charges with FBO's and other major <br />tenants, additional. revenue may be generated creating the capability <br />of a higher bonding capacity to meet local financial requirements. <br />Such new levels of charges must be commensurate with the business <br />potential and the tenant's ability to pay. The City must also take <br />into consideration the restrictive bond covenants and assurances <br />normally as60Ciated with revenue bond financing as these may effect <br />the return of revenues to the City for capital cost recovery or <br />carrying charges. In other words, the City must balance the desir- <br />ability of revenue bond financing of a relatively small portion of its <br />capital requirements against these restrictive obligations and <br />covenants . <br /> <br />Industrial Revenue Bond issues are a means of financing certain faci- <br />lities on airports, and are gaining popularity as a primary and <br />alternate means of developing non-aviation (but aviation related) <br />.L*Venue-producing J:::usinesses at airport locations. However, the com- <br />plexityof the program does require that each specific project be <br />considered on its own merits, and expert council should be sought <br />before Industrial Revenue Bond financing is seriously considered for <br />an improvement. <br /> <br />'lbra1gh the prudent awlication of the financial resources available <br />to the City for its continued development and the ability of <br />management to attain revenues cxmsistent with the airport's growth in <br />potential and opportunities, significant new development can be <br />accomplished. It is obvious that these projections indicate a <br />substantial reliance on obtaining full participation from Federal, <br />state and city S01rCeS. If, for some reason, the participation of one <br />of the major sources cannot be obtained, the City must establish the <br />priority of development consistent with the goals and needs of the <br />airport and the community. <br /> <br />9.8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.