Laserfiche WebLink
<br />mBLB 3.2 <br /> <br />AIR::RAP'.f DliSIGR GlDJP I Ii: :u: <br /> <br />Manufacturer Aircraft lobiel <br /> <br />!ear Jet Col:poration Lear Jet 23,24, 25, 28, 29, <br />35, 55 <br /> <br />Cessna Citatioo I, II <br /> <br />North American P.ockwell corp. Sabreliner 60, 65, 80 <br /> <br />General Aeronautics-Marcel Fan Jet Falcon <br />Dassault (Mystere 20) <br /> <br />Hawker Siddeley Aviatioo., Ltd. HS-125 <br /> <br />Gulfstream <br /> <br />G-I, II, III <br /> <br />It is important to maintain maximum flexibility with respect to <br />ai.:r:port development in context of the real world possibilities of the <br />kird of traffic growth that may be anticipated at San Marcos Municipal <br />Airport:. '!be airports positioo, relative to Austin Mueller Airport <br />must be weighed carefully in the development of plans for major <br />facility improvements. <br /> <br />It is also recommended that the design paving strength be limited. to <br />60,000 pounds gross weight, which will result in a pavement section <br />that will accommodate the vast majority of aircraft in the Transport <br />fleet and still be compatible with the runway lengths mentioned <br />previously. <br /> <br />In addition to the variables previously described, the FAA has <br />implemented new criteria that utilize aircraft approach speeds as a <br />basic criteria for determining the kind of airport facilities that are <br />to be developed. 'ft1i.s method insures closer compatibility with the <br />air space and navigation aids that are to be developed to serve a <br />specific site and will aid in developing compatible facilities, (i.e., <br />the runway-taxiway configuration, length, strength, etc., will be <br />canpatible with the kinds of navigation aids that are to be installed <br />to serve the airport, thus avoiding a situation where more than <br />adequate ground facilities were served by inadequate aids that could <br />not ~te appropriately sized aircraft.) <br /> <br />3.3 <br />