My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1986-106
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1980 s
>
1986
>
Res 1986-106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Creation date
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
1986-106
Date
9/8/1986
Volume Book
82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ rk:__t.-.d.. (~ ProoF;IVJ) <br /> <br />Acoustical treatment can be achieved in many different ways, from <br />requiring specific types of construction practices for new <br />develq:Iment, to treatment of existing dwellings. This section will <br />deal with the treatment of existing dwellings. Sound attenuation can <br />best be achieved through adequate insulation and storm window <br />treatment. Weather striWing, solid oore doors, and air conditioning <br />also help minimize noise impacts to existing dwellings. In San <br />Marcos, the widespread use of air conditioning and the subsequent <br />c]os-n windows help reduce noise annoyance. <br /> <br />This section is included as a land use control alternative only <br />because it can permit continued use of land areas that may, at some <br />point in time, be subjected to additional noise exposure. It should <br />be emphasized that no existing structures, either on or off the <br />aiJ:port, need acoustical treatment for current or anticipated airport <br />activity . <br /> <br />IDxm'agement of insulation/storm window treatment by private h0me- <br />owners can be achieved through cost-sharing techniques, outright <br />grants, and low interest loans. In addition to sound attenuation, <br />these same techniques can add greatly to energy savings for the home- <br />owners. Greater sound attenuation savings can be found in multiple <br />family dwellings where there is usually minimal outdoor living space <br />per family, and a much greater amamt of surface area for insulation. <br /> <br />No matter what type of structure is being treated for sound <br />attenuauat, it is much more c:aJt efficient to do durinq construction <br />of the building rather than to try and treat an existing structure. <br />b oost of treating existing structures may vary with many factors <br />and can be very expensive. However, the cost of ProPer treatment of a <br />new structure usually adds Ii ttle to the overall cost of the <br />structure. As mentioned earlier, the proper place to achieve sound <br />attenuation guidance for new construction is through the building <br />code. In addition to funding for sound attenuation, a public <br />awareness program of techniques available for sound attenuation may <br />interest homeowners in impl:oving their structures. SUch an awareness <br />program ca1ld be i.noJrporated into a distribution packet as a reaul t <br />of this study. <br /> <br />:;1~~ of PfI'Umt'!i"l ~CI'__ .L of Hew ~].".'-Il Within <br />w ~ihle Anu <br /> <br />1hi.s can be aCOOlllplished through two major schemes - tax incentives <br />and outright availability of funds for construction and/or mortgages. <br />Tax incentives can be utilized as a means to keep open agricultural <br />land in production. To prevent the farmer/rancher from having to <br /> <br />6.6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.