My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1986-106
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1980 s
>
1986
>
Res 1986-106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Creation date
8/27/2007 4:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
1986-106
Date
9/8/1986
Volume Book
82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />yield to development pressures, usually due to high property tax <br />assessments, many areas grant them preferential tax treatment. Most <br />states assess taxes based on "highest and best use" value instead of <br />actual-use value or income-producing value. When this happens, <br />farmland surrounded or encroached by urban development is assessed at <br />the higher development value instead of the agricultural value. 1bis <br />forces many farmers/ranchers to sell property in order to pay taxes. <br /> <br />Many states have adopted ways to avoid this problem thrwgh different <br />tax incentive methods. California's Land Conservation Act of 1965 <br />authorizes counties to enter into contractual arrangements with <br />farmers, whereby if the land continues to be used for agricultural <br />purposes for ten years, the land is then assessed at its income <br />producing value. Other states tax agricultural land at its <br />"pJ:cducti.ve character" value. lJbe three most oommon methcxis of doing <br />so are: restricted use, where the land must be subject to some type of <br />land use restriction or control prior to assessing its value; <br />deferred taza:tion, where the taxes on the difference between the <br />property's actual use and its market value are deferred until the <br />property is sold and/or develcp!ch and the preferential assessment, <br />where property is taxed on its actual use, not highest and best use. <br />Tax incentives in the form of tax breaks can also be used to help <br />persuade induStry to develop in a certain area, thus using tax <br />incentives as a CJZ'CW'th guidance tool. <br /> <br />In addition to tax incentives, outright discouragement of financial <br />resources for development or mortgages can be used. Under current <br />policy, the Department of Housing and Urban Development discoora.ges <br />financial assistance for any projects within the 65 LOn contour. 'Ihi.s <br />applies to all BUD programs providing assistance for housing, or to <br />the provision of facilities and services directed at making land <br />available for any ooise sensitive development. <br /> <br />= HDtice ~~ ~~ ~1~, IbDe 81yeJ:S and <br />~. the <br /> <br />sane jurisdictions affected by airport noise have passed ordinances <br />which require the seller to advise the buyer of conditions which may <br />affect the property, such as flooding potential, utility matters and <br />noise effects. 'n1i.s is accomplished by the use of a form advising the <br />buyer of these situations which is incorporated into the purchase <br />negotiations.. '!be form should advise the buyer of the expected sound <br />levels at that particular location and of any local sound attenuation <br />requirements . <br /> <br />6.7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.