Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 5. The solution should give some a~vantage to tho~e who have <br /> already been designated on the priority list; <br /> 6. The solution should help to build confidence within the <br /> development community that adequate capacity is available so <br /> that pressures for speculation of the reservations can be <br /> reduced; and <br /> 7. Some special provision needs to be developed to provide <br /> capacity for future industrial projects. <br /> Realizing some of these factors may actually be in conflict, each <br /> solution developed at the meeting sought to strike a balance between <br /> those factors. The options are listed below (in no particular order) <br /> with a brief description. All options are presented as possible <br /> solutions for allocationg %~R~ining capacity unless otherwise stated. <br /> OPTION I: Original System. Allocate as per priority list (Letter <br /> of Credit; etc.): Advantages - rules already defined, less <br /> confusion, provides greatest certainty that capacity is available <br /> when you are ready to develop. Disadvantages - does not address <br /> principal proble@ of encouraging those who are ready to develop to <br /> do so, has created speculative market (grey market). <br /> OPTION II: Create white market. Allow the first 2øaø LUE's to be <br /> sold by Holder's will to anyone (possibly thru the City). <br /> Allocate remaining capacity as originally designed but alloí~ these <br /> Holders to also sell reservations. Advantages - allows market <br /> place to determine price and allocation, less bureaucracy. <br /> Disadvantages - creates closed market for "lucky ones", adds <br /> additional non-value added cost to development to pay for <br /> speculation expenses. <br /> OPTION III: Eliminate priority list. city grant allocations <br /> based on developed groi~th policy. Advantages - maximum control by <br /> City to determine growth patterns. Disadvantages - difficult to <br /> find equity, City might have to front financing. <br /> OPTION IV: Eliminate priority list. City fronts package plant <br /> projects first come first serve basis. Advantages - eliminates <br /> much of the bureaucracy, equally fair. Disadvantages - City <br /> fronts financing, priority list eliminated. <br /> OPTION V: Overbook. City allocates as in original plan, but <br /> allocates more than capacity realizing not everyone will actually <br /> be able to develop by August 1986. Advantages - probably safe <br /> bet, overbooking could help generate cash for next plant <br /> improvement. Disadvantages - what happens if demand does <br /> materialize rapidly, may present serious legal problems if City is <br /> caught short. <br /> OPTION VI: Tier System. Create a series of tiers of priority <br /> using priority list but based on status of project development. <br /> Each level would include definite criteria (e.g. plat approval, <br /> building per@it submitted, proper zoning obtained, Haster Plan <br />