Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Nichols, Inc. presents the water system design criteria, facflities, and cost <br /> al1ocations for the participating entities. <br /> Consultants for the proposed "Rivergate M.U.D." (or the San Marcos <br /> Municipal Utility District No.1), which is proposed to be developed by Storm <br /> Development, Inc., provided extensive technical input into the initial <br /> engineering design and review of computations. The Rivergate tract covers <br /> approximately 1,345 acres along the west side of IH 35 within the North San <br /> Marcos Service Area. Consulting engineers for Rivergate M.U.D. are Espey <br /> Huston and Associates. <br /> Consultants for the proposed -Highridge M.u.D: {or the Hays County <br /> MUD. No.2), which is proposed to be developed by McLester Grisham and <br /> Gardner Development Corp., also contributed extensively to this plan. The <br /> Highridge tract comprises approximately 5 t 4 acres along the east side of <br /> IH 35 and within the Service Area. The consulting engineers for Highridge <br /> M.U.D. are J. W. French and Associates. <br /> It is anticipated that the City of San Marcos, Rivergate M.U.D. and <br /> Highridge M.U.D. will be the three participating entities in the construction <br /> and financing of the water utility for the North San Marcos Service Area. <br /> ~~ <br /> The methodolgy to develop this water service plan involved several <br /> steps, beginning with land use and population projections for the Service Area <br /> and resulting in construction cost estimates for each of the participating <br /> entities. The first step was the designat ion of boundaries for the North San <br /> Marcos Service Area. The boundaries were selected based on the objective of <br /> providing regional, centralized water and wastewater service north of the <br /> City's existing utl1ity service area and within the ETJ of the City. Areas <br /> outside the City's' ET J or drainage area of an unnamed tributary of the San <br /> Marcos River which is located within the Service Area were generally <br /> excluded from the Service Area. The only exception was the inclusion of <br /> approximately 3.5 sQuare m11es of the lower Sink Creek Watershed which <br /> could readi ly be served by the proposed wastewater system for the new <br /> Service Area. <br />