Laserfiche WebLink
<br />will become much narrower, less subjective, and more quantative. This <br />will form the basis for regulatory (ordinance) change. <br />On the other hand, the map may be interpretated very strictly. In any <br />case, "if a potential developer would like to develop a land use <br />different than that shown on the land use map, he should measure his <br />development against the land use policies... If he meets the policies, <br />then he would have a strong argument for amending the land use map. If <br />he does not meet the policies (as interpreted by decision makers), then <br />the map should not be amended", and the proposed land use will not be <br />authorized (page IV-3, Master Plan). <br />3. Changing the Future Land Use Plan (Map) <br />The existing regulatory process will be used in two of the four ways in <br />which land use decisions will be made and the plan revised. The <br />existing review bodies for subdividing (Planning Commission) and zoning <br />change (Zoning Commission and Council) will, when deciding on plat or <br />zoning cases, authorize a change to the Future Land Use Plan (map). If <br />a request for a building permit were at variance with the map, a change <br />to the map would occur through its review by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commissions. For all other recommended changes to the Future Land Use <br />Plan, originating from any source to include staff, the review would be <br />made by the Planning and Zoning Commissions jointly. <br />In any and all cases, the Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policles <br />would be used as the basis for a decision concerning a revision of the <br />Future Land Use Plan (map). <br /> IV-43 <br />