Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6. Whet hezerdous or toxic materia1s win be used in the menu... <br />fðcturing process Dt the new CTEC plent? Whet provisions are <br />beint) m8de to deDI with these materials? If stored in contoin- <br />ers, Wf'\ðt win be done with these containers? <br />7. We understðnd thet the Reed report was en in-house study <br />mede by CTEC.s perent compeny, GE. Thi5 report steted that <br />the reactor plans developed by GE were inadequote to do the <br />job for which they were desioned. We e1so understelnd that <br />this report was kept secret from the pub1tc end that plcns <br />for the plant were sold to eleven different cities ccross the <br />netion enyway. The result has been much loss of funds for <br />both the cOmmunities end the compcny who ðre involved in <br />lew sufts over the matter. Wil1 our city government have <br />ecees! to ðJl tn-house studies done by either parent company <br />concerning the proposed CTEC p1ont and mðke these studies <br />avðHable to interested pðrties? <br />8. Whet tire some other joint ventures that GE h"5 with other <br />compðnies end wheat ere the records? <br />9. Why wasn't the Victory Gðrdens ereð not irK ~ '.lded in the <br />process of determining the Enterprise Zone? Why was the <br />erea taken for granted end the people not informed? <br />10. Why isn't CTEC going throu9h the normal chðnne13 to get the <br />pltmt 1nto our tlre8? Why were Uu: t;uunty (,ommi~~i()ne 'L3 not <br />notified? <br />11. How wes CTEC formed? Who put the proposol toQether? Whot <br />Wð5 the motivction? <br />12. Why did CTEC choose San Marcos? <br />Compiled by ð group of concemed citizens <br />Contact: 604 N. Gucdclupe Phone:39ó--4222 <br />~ - c-'..' "'-, (;. k.k~ <br /> - .. . <br />'_;.~'I r'~~'"".;,',.M.' ',j <br />. ,,"?à r .~- ".'~-' ....................,;c,'. <br /> }1/1 ~.." os I~ <br />