My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10032006 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2000 s
>
2006
>
10032006 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2015 12:36:13 PM
Creation date
10/16/2007 4:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
10/3/2006
Volume Book
169
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Meeting October 3, 2006 Page 7 <br />Mr. Mihalkanin moved for adoption of the <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Guerrero moved <br />Narvaiz as voting member and Chris Jones <br />and Mr. Jones seconded the motion, which <br />then voted unanimously for adoption of t <br />Resolution, and Mr. Thomaides <br />to amend Part 1, to read Susan <br />as the alternate voting member, <br />passed unanimously. The Council <br />ze Resolution. <br />Mayor Narvaiz introduced removal from the table and discussion regarding <br />the Downtown Master Plan Request for Proposals and direction to Staff. Mr. <br />Guerrero moved to remove from the table, and Mr. Thomaides seconded the <br />motion, which passed unanimously. Scott Gregson, Main Street Advisory <br />Board, stated the Planning and Zoning Commission, Main Street Advisory <br />Board and the Planning and Development Services Department has prepared a <br />Request for Proposal intended to be issued to consultants selected to <br />respond with a proposal for preparation of a Downtown Master Plan. The <br />Downtown Master Plan will include topic elements intended to plan and <br />address issues related to improving and positioning downtown as a viable <br />destination. Mr. O'Leary stated the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />discussed the importance of all the elements in the scope of work, which <br />included the difficulty in separating completion of the Master Plan work <br />into a two phased approach. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested <br />that more funding be allocated toward the completion of the entire Master <br />Plan. He stated the Main Street has allocated funds from their Budget to <br />help support the Master Plan. Mayor Narvaiz inquired to whether these funds <br />are in the Main Street Budget. Mr. O'Leary stated these funds are in the <br />Main Street budget in their CIP account. Mayor Narvaiz inquired whether <br />the funds would be transferred into a different line item to secure the <br />funding. Ms. Barrett stated the funding could be handled that way. Mr. <br />Mihalkanin inquired to whether this would need a budget adjustment. Mr. <br />O'Leary stated since the funding is in the Main Street CIP, then he will be <br />able to control since Main Street is a City Department. The Council agreed <br />by consensus to combine the funding and send back to Main Street Advisory <br />Board and Planning and Zoning Commission to review the RFP process. <br />Mayor Narvaiz introduced a discussion regarding the Wireless Broadband <br />Opportunity for San Marcos and direction to Staff. John Cooper, President <br />of MetroNetIQ, provided the Council with a powerpoint presentation of his <br />briefing. Mr. Thomaides stated he supports moving forward with the <br />Wireless San Marcos Project. Mr. Guerrero also stated he supports moving <br />forward with the Wireless San Marcos Project. He stated he feels this will <br />help attract businesses to San Marcos. Mr. Mihalkanin inquired to whether <br />the equipment being put on light poles would be hazardous to lighting. Mr. <br />Cooper stated the equipment would be grounded, but it still would be <br />subject to lightening strikes. Mr. Mihalkanin inquired to how the citizens <br />would receive the wireless services. Mr. Cooper stated the modem unit <br />would cost about $100.00 and could be placed in the window of their home. <br />He stated most Cities charge a low monthly rate. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he <br />has some concerns with interfering in an active market. Mr. Mihalkanin <br />inquired to how this wireless project would affect the University's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.