Laserfiche WebLink
<br />18 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />February 9, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Mr. Farr moved for adoption of the Ordinance on third and final <br />reading and Mr. Coddington seconded the motion. Mr. Hankins read <br />suggested language into the record for the first portion of Section <br />2.01 as follows: "The parties desire that development within the <br />District be conducted as compatibly as possible with in-City develop- <br />ment. . . . The parties agree hat the property within the District <br />will be developed and improvements constructed thereon in conformance <br />with the then current Standard Codes relating to building, fire pre- <br />vention, gas, mechanical, plumbing and swimming pools, as published <br />by the Southern-Building Code Congress International and the Nation- <br />al Electric Code. . . . LRL agrees to impose certain deedrestric- <br />tions . . . and a requirement that an extended insured warranty pro- <br />gram which includes a mandatory inspection procedure by inspectors <br />who are duly qualified in the disciplines for which they are making <br />the inspection, be provided on each residence constructed and sold <br />within the District." Mayor Younger moved to amend the Agreement <br />attached to the Ordinance as re~d into the record by Mr. Hankins <br />and Mr. Farr seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote <br />was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: <br /> <br />Brown, Coddington, Farr, Younger, Kissler, Nicola. <br /> <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Guerra. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Beginning with the very next sentence in Section 2.01, Mr. Hankins <br />suggested wording regarding inspections. The Council discussed 24 <br />hours being too short a period of time, and Mr. Robbins stated he was <br />more comfortable with 48 hours. Mr. Robbins stated the City should <br />inspect for the City's standards and not pay for their warranty in- <br />spections and suggested they handle their warranty inspections. Mr. <br />Gonzalez stated the inspections could be contracted out and set a fee <br />to cover whatever costs are involved. Jeff Lewis expressed concern <br />for inspections of slabs if 48 hours was applied, and Mr. Robbins <br />stated slabs would take priority. Mr. Robbins and Mr. Lewis reached <br />consensus on wording of 24 hour inspections on slabs and 48 hours on <br />all other inspections. Mr. Hankins suggested the following wording: <br />"The program must provide covereage for at least five years. Said <br />inspections will be done by the City at rates no higher than tïï:õ"S'e <br />established by the applicable building codes and will be provided <br />within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt of a request for foundation <br />inspectionsahd forty-eight (48) hours for all other inspections. Such <br />inspectors shall be certified to satisfy the requirements of the ex- <br />tended insured warranty program. Mayor Younger moved to amend the <br />Agreement attached to the Ordinance in Section 2.01 as read into the <br />record by Mr. Hankins and Mr. Farr seconded the motion, which passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Beginning with the very next sentence in Section 2.01, Mr. Hankins <br />suggested wording regarding the deed restrictions: "The deed re- <br />strictions will include requirements as to setbacks, buffers and simi- <br />lar matters and be based, quantitatively and qualitatively, upon the <br />City of San Marcos zoning and landscaping standards in effect on the <br />date of this Agreement." Mr. Hankins continued reading the language <br />as written through eight lines and three words on Page 3 of the Agree- <br />ment. Mr. Lewis agreed for the underlined wording starting on the <br />fourth line of Page 3 (provided, however, if modifications to the <br />deed restrictions are intended to reduce the minimum requirements, <br />the City Planning Department does not approve the modification, the <br />arbitration procedure described in this Section 2.01 is to be utilized) <br />to be deleted in its entirety and a period be placed at the end of the <br />preceding word "modification". Mr. Lewis stated he was concerned the <br />City might require standards they would not be able to meet at a future <br />