02091987 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

19 Regular Meeting February 9, 1987 Page 10 time regarding zoning regulation criteria. Mr. Lewis stated he wants the deed restrictions reviewed by Planning, and if they are unaccept- able, then the matter would be submitted to arbitration. Mr. Hankins stated the standards need to be set for arbitration. Mr. Robbins suggested the Council consider approval of A.I.C.P. arbitration stand- ards, and Mr. Lewis stated that would be acceptable. Mr. Hankins stated the City would lose control if this provision stayed in the Agreement as written. Mr. Brown and Mr. Nicola were in favor of wording for City's standards as they are amended, Mr. Farr stated the City's current Standards for PUDs and PDDs are quìte flexible but thinks ar~itration w~uld be acceptable, Mr. Coddington, Mayor Younger and MS. Klssler are ln favor of arbit!l::"ation and Mr. GUerra made no com- ments. The Council then voted on wording suggested by Mr. Hankins, beginning on Page 2 (liThe deed restrictions. . . .It). Mayor Younger amended his motion and Mr. Brown amended his second for the wording suggested by Mr. Hankins to include the language as discussed through the third line on Page 3 for a period to follow the word "modification" and the next two sentences to be deleted, which amendment was passed unanimously by the Council. Mayor Younger suggested wording that the three landplanners for arbi- tration be A.I.C.P. certified. Mr. Hankins suggested the following wording: "If the City refuses to approve the deed restrictions, the parties agree to submit them for arbitration, which process shall be paid for solely by LRL. Two landplanners who hold A.I.C.P. designa- tions, one selected by each party hereto shall review the proposed deed restrictions. In the event the two landplanners cannot agree on appropriate deed restrictions, the two landplanners will mutually select a third landplanner who will hold an A.I.C.P. designation, whose determination as to the deed restrictions to apply to the pro- perty described in this Agreement will be binding on LRL and the City." Mayor Younger moved to amend the Agreement in Section 2.01 as suggested by Mr. Hankins and Mr. Guerra seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: AYE: Coddington, Farr, Younger, Guerra, Kissler. NAY: Brown, Nicola. ABSTAIN: None. Mr. Farr then moved the Council amend the Agreement in Section 2.01 five lines from the bottom of Page 2 as written, "LRL agrees to sub- mit its proposed deed restrictions to the City Planning Department for review and approval at the time of final plat approval on a plat by plat basis," and Mayor Younger seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Farr moved to amend the Agreement to accept the wording as written in Sections 2.02, 3.01, 3.02 and Mayor Younger seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Farr moved to amend the Agreement to accept the wording as written in Section 3.03 with the exception the price of the land never exceed $7,500 per acre and Mr. Coddington seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Coddington moved to amend the Agreement to accept the wording as written in Sections 3.04, 3.05, 3.06, 3.07, Article Five, Article Six, Article Seven and Article Eight and Mayor Younger seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.