Ord 2015-029/consider the annexation of 965.00 +/- acres, consisting of multiple tracts of land and associated rights-of-way, located within 13 separate areas within the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) as guided by the City of San Marcos Annexation/E

Home Browse Search

1. On July 7 and July 21, 2015, the City Council of the City of San Marcos, Texas conducted public hearings regarding the proposed annexation of multiple tracts of land and associated rights -of -way within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction. 2. Seventeen areas were originally proposed for annexation as identified in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. Upon further consideration, however, the City Council removed the areas identified as Areas 4, 8, 11, 13, 15 and 17 from consideration for annexation under this ordinance. 3. The remaining areas, consisting of 946 acres, more or less of land, but excluding any portions thereof subject to a development agreement under Section 43.035 of the Texas Local Government Code, are the subject of this ordinance and further described in Exhibits "A- 1" through "A -I1," attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the "Annexation Areas "). The properties originally within such Annexation Areas that are subject to development agreements are identified in Exhibit "A -12," attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. 4. The Annexation Areas are contiguous and adjacent to the current boundaries of the City. 5. The requirements of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code and other applicable laws have been met. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITE' COUNCIL OF THE CITE' OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The recitals of this ordinance are approved and adopted. SECTION 2. The Annexation Areas described in Exhibits "A- I" through "A -11" and listed below, excluding the portions thereof subject to development agreements described in Exhibit "A -12," are annexed into and are a part of the City of San Marcos, Texas and subject to the acts, ordinances, resolutions and regulations of the City (as noted in the Recitals, certain areas originally proposed for annexation are intentionally omitted, thus leaving gaps in the numbering sequence):