Laserfiche WebLink
<br />81 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting June 26, 1995 Page 2 <br /> <br />billing until after the testing is completed. Mr. Cox advised a <br />citizen contacted him suggesting the need for the City to publish a <br />guide regarding what citizens can put in the sewer system, a <br />document that can be distributed to the community advising what is <br />and is not environmentally desirable. Mr. Gilley was directed to <br />bring something back to the Council. Mr. Mooney suggested a series <br />of articles in the newspaper also might be helpful. Mayor Morris <br />expressed concern how the City can help those who have been unable <br />to determine the sources of their problems. The Council discussed I <br />the fact they want businesses to make the capital investment to <br />correct their COD levels rather than paying the surcharge. Mr. <br />Moore stated he wants the Ordinance passed to be implemented in <br />September. Mr. Taylor stated that could be done by inserting a new <br />section 2 with the effective date September 1, 1995 and renumbering <br />the remaining Sections. Mr. Moore moved to add this amendment to <br />his original motion for adoption and Mr. Cox agreed to add this to <br />his second. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Moore, Morris, Cox. <br /> <br />NAY: Mooney, Hart, Guerra, Hernandez. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />The motion failed. Mr. Hart moved to reconsider the Ordinance and <br />Mr. HerDandez seconded the motion. On roll call the following'vote <br />was recorded:' <br /> <br />AYE: Moore, Hart, Morris, Guerra, Cox, Hernandez. <br /> <br />NAY: Mooney. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Hart moved for adoption of the Ordinance on emergency and to I <br />amend Proposal 1 included in the Ordinance with September 1, 1995 as <br />the effective date and Mr. Guerra seconded the motion. Mr. Moore <br />stated he would vote no on this motion because if it is easier to <br />pay the surcharge than to clean up, this would be an inequity. Mr. <br />Mooney stated he does not want residents to be charged. Mr. Cox <br />stated cutting the rate by a nickel is as far as he is willing to <br />go; that beyond that point defeats the purpose of the Ordinance, to <br />bring down the treatment level. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: . <br /> <br />AYE: Hart, Guerra. <br /> <br />NAY: Moore, Mooney, Morris, cox, Hernandez. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />The motion failed. Mayor Morris moved to reconsider the Ordinance <br />and Mr. Cox seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote <br />was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Moore, Hart, Morris, cox, Hernandez. <br /> <br />NAY: Mooney, Guerra. I <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore moved for adoption of the Ordinance on emergency as <br />presented with the exception of the effective date being September <br />1, 1995 and ~r. Cox seconded the motion. Mr. Cox stated he thinks <br />by cutting a nickel, our best interests would be served, and this <br />would be a reasonable compromise. There would continue to be a <br />subsidy from Fund Balance, and the overall system would require a <br />rate increase October 1. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Moore, Hart, Morris, Cox. <br /> <br />NAY: Mooney, Guerra, Hernandez. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />